CVE-2023-50222
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInductive Automation Ignition ResponseParser Notification Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Inductive Automation Ignition. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must connect to a malicious server. The specific flaw exists within the ResponseParser method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-22067.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the ResponseParser method of Inductive Automation Ignition, where improper validation of user-supplied data allows deserialization of untrusted data. This deserialization flaw can be triggered when a user connects to a malicious server, enabling remote attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.35CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Ignition versionAccess the Ignition Gateway web interface, go to the Status page, or check the gateway's about section. Alternatively, inspect the ignition.xml configuration file or check the installation directory for version information.Affected if The installed version is 8.1.0 through 8.1.34 (inclusive)
-
Verify Gateway network connectivityReview network firewall rules and Gateway network configuration to determine if outbound connections to untrusted or unknown servers are possible.Affected if The Gateway can initiate outbound connections to servers that are not explicitly trusted or within a controlled network segment
-
Check for external Gateway client connectionsInspect Gateway logs for connection attempts from external or unrecognized Gateway servers, particularly looking for instances where this Gateway acts as a client connecting to remote servers.Affected if The Gateway is configured to connect to or has recently connected to remote servers that are not within your trusted network infrastructure
-
Review deserialization settingsExamine the Gateway configuration files (particularly ignition.xml) for any non-standard deserialization settings or custom serializer configurations in the ResponseParser-related settings.Affected if Non-default serialization configurations are present that may weaken the deserialization protection in the ResponseParser
You are affected if your Ignition version is 8.1.0 through 8.1.34 AND your Gateway can connect to untrusted external servers, as the vulnerability is exploited through client connections to malicious servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.35
Apply vendor-provided patches for Ignition and avoid connecting to untrusted servers. Implement network segmentation and restrict outbound connections to only legitimate Ignition gateways.
Ignition 8.1.35 or later
- 1. Back up the Ignition gateway configuration and any critical project files before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade will require a brief service interruption.
- 3. Download the Ignition 8.1.35 (or later) installer from the official Inductive Automation website at inductiveautomation.com.
- 4. Stop the Ignition gateway service on the affected server.
- 5. Run the installer and follow the prompts to upgrade the existing Ignition installation.
- 6. After installation completes, start the Ignition gateway service.
- 7. Verify the gateway is operational and check that the version shows 8.1.35 or later.
- 8. Test critical applications and workflows to ensure functionality is intact after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50222 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50222 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data