Dryice MyxalyticsApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2023-50347

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HCL DRYiCE MyXalytics is impacted by an insecure SQL interface vulnerability, potentially giving an attacker the ability to execute custom SQL queries. A malicious user can run arbitrary SQL commands including changing system configuration.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

HCL DRYiCE MyXalytics contains an insecure SQL interface that allows attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries. This SQL injection vulnerability enables manipulation of the underlying database, including changing system configuration settings.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the application, implement WAF rules to detect SQL injection patterns, and monitor database logs for suspicious query activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dryice MyxalyticsApplication
Affected:= 5.9= 6.0= 6.1= 6.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed MyXalytics version
    Locate the installation directory or check the product about/version information in the application UI. Common paths include C:\Program Files\HCL\MyXalytics or /opt/hcl/myxalytics. Check version files like version.properties, manifest, or the installer log.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.9, 6.0, 6.1, or 6.2
  2. Verify SQL interface endpoint accessibility
    Identify if the application exposes a SQL query interface or API endpoint. Check web configuration files (server.xml, web.xml) or application configuration for endpoints that accept SQL parameters. Common patterns include /sql, /query, /database/execute, or custom SQL endpoints.
    Affected if An HTTP endpoint accepts raw SQL parameters or exposes database query functionality without proper parameterization
  3. Check network exposure of the application
    Review firewall rules, network ACLs, or reverse proxy configuration to determine if the MyXalytics web interface is accessible from untrusted networks. Check if the application listens on all interfaces (0.0.0.0) versus localhost only.
    Affected if The application SQL interface is reachable from networks other than trusted admin networks or localhost
  4. Inspect application logs for suspicious SQL activity
    Review database query logs or application audit logs for unusual SQL patterns, especially queries containing UNION, DROP, INSERT, UPDATE, orEXEC sp_ that were not initiated by legitimate administrators.
    Affected if Logs show SQL injection attempts or unauthorized database modifications

You are affected if HCL DRYiCE MyXalytics version 5.9, 6.0, 6.1, or 6.2 is installed AND the SQL interface is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the application, implement WAF rules to detect SQL injection patterns, and monitor database logs for suspicious query activity.

Fix this in Dryice Myxalytics Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50347 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50347 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data