Dryice MyxalyticsApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2024-42180

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HCL MyXalytics is affected by a malicious file upload vulnerability. The application accepts invalid file uploads, including incorrect content types, double extensions, null bytes, and special characters, allowing attackers to upload and execute malicious files.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

HCL MyXalytics contains a file upload vulnerability allowing arbitrary file uploads due to insufficient validation of content types, double extensions, null bytes, and special characters. Attackers can bypass upload restrictions to deploy malicious files that may be executed on the server.

MitigationImplement strict allowlist-based file validation including verified content-type checking, extension validation with double-extension prevention, null byte stripping, and filename sanitization; store uploads outside webroot and disable script execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dryice MyxalyticsApplication
Affected:= 6.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed MyXalytics version
    Locate the application version in the product UI under Help > About, or check version files in the installation directory (such as version.properties, manifest.mf, or similar metadata files)
    Affected if the installed version is exactly 6.3
  2. Confirm file upload feature is accessible
    Log into the MyXalytics application and navigate to any feature that provides file upload capability (document import, attachment upload, data import wizards)
    Affected if the file upload feature is present and accessible to users
  3. Inspect upload directory location
    Examine the web server configuration or application settings to determine where uploaded files are stored; check for an 'uploads', 'attachments', or similar directory in the webroot
    Affected if uploaded files are stored within the web-accessible directory tree (webroot) rather than outside it
  4. Verify script execution is not disabled on upload directories
    Review web server configuration (IIS web.config, Apache .htaccess, or equivalent) for the upload directory to confirm that script execution handlers are explicitly denied
    Affected if script execution is permitted or not explicitly denied for the upload directory (no handler restrictions found)
  5. Check for file validation configuration
    Inspect application configuration files or source code for upload validation logic; look for content-type allowlisting, extension validation, double-extension blocking, or null-byte handling
    Affected if no strict allowlist-based validation is configured, or weak blacklist-only validation exists

A defender is affected if they run HCL MyXalytics version 6.3 with the file upload feature enabled and the application does not have strict allowlist validation, stores uploads in webroot, or permits script execution in upload directories.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict allowlist-based file validation including verified content-type checking, extension validation with double-extension prevention, null byte stripping, and filename sanitization; store uploads outside webroot and disable script execution.

Fix this in Dryice Myxalytics Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-42180 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-42180 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data