CVE-2023-50959
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2,19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3,20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 22.0.1,2 2.0.2, 23.0.1, and 23.0.2 may allow end users to query more documents than expected from a connected Enterprise Content Management system when configured to use a system account. IBM X-Force ID: 275938.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation contains an access control vulnerability where end users can query more documents than intended from a connected Enterprise Content Management system when the integration is configured to use a system account. The system account's elevated permissions are improperly applied to end user queries, allowing unauthorized document access beyond what users should be permitted to view.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.0.0= 18.0.1= 18.0.2= 19.0.1= 19.0.2= 19.0.3= 20.0.1= 20.0.2= 20.0.3= 21.0.1= 21.0.2= 21.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of IBM Cloud Pak for Business AutomationCheck the installed version of IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation in your environment using the platform's version command or admin consoleAffected if The installed version matches any of these: 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, or 21.0.3
-
Verify if an Enterprise Content Management integration is configuredExamine the IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation configuration to determine if any ECM system (such as FileNet Content Manager or Content Manager) is integratedAffected if An ECM integration is configured and active in the environment
-
Check whether the ECM integration uses a system account for connectivityReview the ECM integration settings to determine if a system-level account (as opposed to user-specific accounts) is being used to connect to the ECM systemAffected if The ECM integration is configured to use a system account rather than per-user authentication
You are affected if you are running any of the listed versions AND have an ECM integration configured to use a system account, as this allows end users to inherit elevated permissions and access documents beyond their authorized scope.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview and restrict the system account permissions in the ECM integration configuration to ensure end users can only access documents they are individually authorized to view. Implement proper user-level authorization checks before executing ECM queries.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-50959 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-50959 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data