CVE-2023-51618
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DIR-X3260 prog.cgi SetWLanRadioSecurity Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DIR-X3260 routers. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the prog.cgi binary, which handles HNAP requests made to the lighttpd webserver listening on TCP ports 80 and 443. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21595.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the prog.cgi binary of D-Link DIR-X3260 routers. The SetWLanRadioSecurity function fails to validate user-supplied input before copying it to a fixed-length stack buffer. Authentication is required, but successful exploitation yields root-level code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.04b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router web interface or check the device label/marketing materials to confirm the model is D-Link DIR-X3260Affected if Device is not a D-Link DIR-X3260 router
-
Check firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to the Status or System Information page to view the firmware version. Alternatively, check via CLI if available or examine the firmware file if extracted.Affected if Firmware version is 1.04b01 or higher (the vulnerability affects versions prior to 1.04b01)
-
Verify web interface is enabledAttempt to access http://router-ip/cgi-bin/prog.cgi or check router settings for web management interface statusAffected if The prog.cgi endpoint is not accessible or web management is disabled
-
Confirm wireless functionality is activeCheck router wireless settings to determine if any WLAN radios are enabled and configuredAffected if Wireless is disabled - the vulnerable SetWLanRadioSecurity function would not be reachable
The device is affected if it is a D-Link DIR-X3260 running firmware version prior to 1.04b01 with the web interface and wireless features enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.04b01
Apply vendor firmware update when available; until then, restrict network access to management interfaces (ports 80/443) and enforce strong authentication credentials.
D-Link DIR-X3260 Firmware version 1.04b01 or later
- Check the current firmware version on the D-Link DIR-X3260 router via the web management interface (usually under Status or System section)
- Download firmware version 1.04b01 or later from D-Link's official support website (support.dlink.com or supportannouncement.us.dlink.com)
- Log into the router's web interface as an administrator
- Navigate to the firmware upgrade section (typically under Administration > Firmware Upgrade or System > Maintenance)
- Upload the downloaded firmware file and initiate the upgrade
- Wait for the router to reboot and complete the update process
- Verify the new firmware version is 1.04b01 or higher in the router's status page
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,296.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51618 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51618 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data