CVE-2023-51621
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DIR-X3260 prog.cgi SetDeviceSettings Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DIR-X3260 routers. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the prog.cgi binary, which handles HNAP requests made to the lighttpd webserver listening on TCP ports 80 and 443. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before copying it to a fixed-size stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21670.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in D-Link DIR-X3260 routers prog.cgi binary. The vulnerability exists in HNAP request handling where user-supplied input is copied to a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking, allowing authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code as root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.04b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router web interface or check the device label/marketing materials to confirm the exact model is D-Link DIR-X3260Affected if The device is not a DIR-X3260 model
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to Status or Management section to view the firmware version; alternatively, use the command 'cat /proc/version' or 'grep VERSION /etc/os-release' via telnet/SSH if availableAffected if The firmware version is any version prior to 1.04b01 (e.g., 1.04b00, 1.03, etc.)
-
Verify if the HNAP interface is accessibleAttempt to access the prog.cgi endpoint via HTTP/HTTPS (typically at /HNAP1/ or via the main CGI endpoint); send a request to the router's IP on ports 80 or 443Affected if The HNAP interface responds to requests, indicating the prog.cgi binary with the vulnerability is in use
-
Check remote management settingsIn the router web interface, navigate to Advanced > Remote Management or similar; verify if Remote Management is enabled and which IP addresses or ranges are permittedAffected if Remote management is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks (e.g., WAN)
You are affected if you have a DIR-X3260 router running firmware version below 1.04b01 with the HNAP interface exposed to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.04b01
Apply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict administrative access to trusted users only and disable remote management if possible.
Firmware version 1.04b01 or later
- Obtain firmware version 1.04b01 or later from D-Link's official support website (supportannouncement.us.dlink.com)
- Access the D-Link DIR-X3260 router's web management interface via HTTP or HTTPS
- Log in with administrator credentials
- Navigate to the System or Administration section of the router settings
- Locate the Firmware Upgrade or Update option
- Upload the fixed firmware file (1.04b01 or later)
- Wait for the firmware upload and installation to complete - do not power off the device
- After reboot, verify the firmware version has been updated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51621 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51621 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data