CVE-2023-51622
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DIR-X3260 prog.cgi SetTriggerPPPoEValidate Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of D-Link DIR-X3260 routers. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the prog.cgi binary, which handles HNAP requests made to the lighttpd webserver listening on TCP ports 80 and 443. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before copying it to a fixed-size stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-21672.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the prog.cgi binary of D-Link DIR-X3260 routers. The flaw exists in the HNAP request handler within the lighttpd web server due to insufficient validation of user-supplied strings before copying them to a fixed-size stack buffer. An authenticated, network-adjacent attacker can exploit this to execute arbitrary code in the context of the root user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.04b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelCheck if the target device is a D-Link DIR-X3260 router by accessing the router's web interface or checking the device label/menuAffected if Device is a D-Link DIR-X3260 model
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the router's web interface and navigate to the Status or System Information page to view the firmware version, or use the command line to check if availableAffected if Firmware version is below 1.04b01 (versions like 1.04, 1.03, etc.)
-
Verify lighttpd web server is runningCheck if the router's web interface is accessible on ports 80 or 443, as the vulnerability exists in the prog.cgi binary served by lighttpdAffected if The web interface is accessible and the prog.cgi binary is present
-
Confirm HNAP functionality is enabledVerify that HNAP (Home Network Administration Protocol) is enabled on the router, typically accessible via the web interface or by sending an HTTP request to /HNAP1/Affected if HNAP endpoint is reachable and the device responds to HNAP requests
-
Assess network accessibilityDetermine if the router's management interface is exposed to untrusted networks, as the attacker must be network-adjacentAffected if The router's web interface is accessible from an untrusted or public network segment
The device is affected if it is a D-Link DIR-X3260 router running firmware version below 1.04b01 with the lighttpd web server and HNAP functionality accessible to an attacker on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.04b01
Apply the vendor-supplied firmware update when released. Until then, restrict access to the router's web interface to trusted users only, disable remote management if not required, and monitor for indicators of compromise.
Firmware version 1.04b01
- 1. Download the firmware version 1.04b01 or later from the official D-Link support website (supportannouncement.us.dlink.com)
- 2. Access the D-Link DIR-X3260 router web interface by navigating to the router's IP address (typically 192.168.0.1)
- 3. Log in with administrative credentials
- 4. Navigate to the Administration or System Settings section
- 5. Locate the Firmware Upgrade or Update option
- 6. Upload the downloaded firmware file (1.04b01 or later)
- 7. Wait for the firmware upload and installation to complete - do not power off the device
- 8. After reboot, verify the firmware version in the router settings to confirm the update was successful
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-51622 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-51622 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data