Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2023-52882

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.4.276 / 5.10.217 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clk: sunxi-ng: h6: Reparent CPUX during PLL CPUX rate change While PLL CPUX clock rate change when CPU is running from it works in vast majority of cases, now and then it causes instability. This leads to system crashes and other undefined behaviour. After a lot of testing (30+ hours) while also doing a lot of frequency switches, we can't observe any instability issues anymore when doing reparenting to stable clock like 24 MHz oscillator.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:>= 4.17, < 5.4.276>= 5.5, < 5.10.217>= 5.11, < 5.15.159>= 5.16, < 6.1.91>= 6.2, < 6.6.31>= 6.7, < 6.8.10= 6.9
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.4.276 / 5.10.217 / 5.15.159 or later
Fixed in 5.4.2765.10.2175.15.159
Vendor patch git.kernel.org →
Recommended fix High confidence

Linux Kernel 5.4.276+ / 5.10.217+ / 5.15.159+ / 6.1.91+ (or Debian 11/12 with patched kernel)

  1. For Linux Kernel: Upgrade to a patched version: 5.4.276+, 5.10.217+, 5.15.159+, or 6.1.91+ depending on your current branch
  2. For Debian 10 (Buster): Note that Debian 10 is end-of-life. Consider upgrading to Debian 11 (LTS) or Debian 12, which include patched kernels
  3. If running a distribution kernel, use your package manager to update (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get upgrade linux-image-arm64 or similar)
  4. If running a custom kernel, apply the commit 0b82eb134d2942ecc669e2ab2be3f0a58d79428a or a subsequent fix and rebuild
  5. After upgrade, verify the kernel version matches or exceeds one of the fixed versions listed above
Caveat Kernel upgrades may require system reboot and could have compatibility implications with custom modules or specific hardware configurations

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-52882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-52882 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data