CVE-2023-6549
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway allows Unauthenticated Denial of Service and Out-Of-Bounds Memory Read
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer boundary validation flaw in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger a denial of service condition and perform out-of-bounds memory reads. The vulnerability stems from improper restriction of memory buffer operations, enabling attackers to access memory outside allocated boundaries without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.1, < 12.1-55.302>= 13.0, < 13.0-92.21>= 13.1, < 13.1-37.176>= 13.1, < 13.1-51.15>= 14.1, < 14.1-12.35>= 13.0, < 13.0-92.21>= 13.1, < 13.1-51.15>= 14.1, < 14.1-12.35CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if NetScaler ADC or Gateway is deployedCheck system inventory or network documentation for Citrix NetScaler Application Delivery Controller or NetScaler Gateway appliances in the environmentAffected if The product is NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway
-
Retrieve the installed NetScaler versionRun the command 'show version' or 'nsversion' on the NetScaler command line interface, or check the version displayed in the NetScaler management GUI under System > InformationAffected if Unable to retrieve a version number indicates the system may not be NetScaler
-
Compare the installed version against affected rangesMatch the retrieved version to these ranges: ADC 12.1 before 55.302, ADC/Gateway 13.0 before 92.21, ADC 13.1 before 37.176 or before 51.15, ADC/Gateway 14.1 before 12.35Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 12.1-12.1-55.301, 13.0-13.0-92.20, 13.1-13.1-37.175 or 13.1-13.1-51.14, 14.1-14.1-12.34
-
Confirm management interface exposureDetermine if the NetScaler management interface (NSIP/Management IP) is accessible from untrusted networks or the internetAffected if The management interface is externally accessible and the version is affected, increasing exploitation likelihood
If the system runs NetScaler ADC or Gateway and the installed version matches any of the listed affected ranges, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2023-6549.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.1-55.30213.0-92.2113.1-37.176
Apply the vendor patch released by Citrix for NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway. Prior to deployment, validate the patch in a non-production environment and ensure backup configurations are available.
NetScaler ADC 12.1 -> 12.1-55.302; ADC 13.0 -> 13.0-92.21; ADC/Gateway 13.1 -> 13.1-51.15; Gateway 14.1 -> 14.1-12.35
- 1. Identify the current NetScaler ADC and/or NetScaler Gateway version installed in your environment
- 2. For NetScaler ADC 12.1: Upgrade to version 12.1-55.302 or later
- 3. For NetScaler ADC 13.0: Upgrade to version 13.0-92.21 or later
- 4. For NetScaler ADC 13.1: Upgrade to version 13.1-51.15 or later (note: earlier 13.1 versions may need intermediate upgrade to 13.1-37.176 first)
- 5. For NetScaler Gateway 13.0: Upgrade to version 13.0-92.21 or later
- 6. For NetScaler Gateway 13.1: Upgrade to version 13.1-51.15 or later
- 7. For NetScaler Gateway 14.1: Upgrade to version 14.1-12.35 or later
- 8. After upgrade, verify the new version is running and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-6549 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-6549 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data