CVE-2024-0841
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA null pointer dereference flaw was found in the hugetlbfs_fill_super function in the Linux kernel hugetlbfs (HugeTLB pages) functionality. This issue may allow a local user to crash the system or potentially escalate their privileges on the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the hugetlbfs_fill_super function in the Linux kernel's HugeTLB pages (hugetlbfs) implementation. This flaw can be exploited by a local authenticated user to crash the system (denial of service) or potentially achieve privilege escalation by triggering the null pointer dereference.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1, < 5.4.271>= 5.5, < 5.10.212>= 5.11, < 5.15.151>= 5.16, < 6.1.79>= 6.2, < 6.6.18>= 6.7, < 6.7.6= 8.0= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version falls within any of these ranges: >= 5.1 and < 5.4.271; >= 5.5 and < 5.10.212; >= 5.11 and < 5.15.151; >= 5.16 and < 6.1.79; >= 6.2 and < 6.6.18; >= 6.7 and < 6.7.6
-
Verify hugetlbfs is available in the kernelCheck the kernel configuration file: 'cat /boot/config-$(uname -r) | grep CONFIG_HUGETLBFS' - look for CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=yAffected if CONFIG_HUGETLBFS is set to 'y' (enabled) in the kernel configuration
-
Check if hugetlbfs is mounted or usableRun 'mount | grep hugetlbfs' or 'cat /proc/filesystems | grep hugetlbfs' to see if hugetlbfs is registered as a supported filesystemAffected if hugetlbfs appears in /proc/filesystems or is actively mounted
-
Verify huge pages are configuredCheck /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages to see if any huge pages are allocated: 'cat /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages'Affected if nr_hugepages is greater than 0, indicating huge pages are in use
The system is affected if the kernel version is within the vulnerable ranges AND hugetlbfs is enabled and available on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.4.2715.10.2125.15.151
Apply the corresponding Linux kernel security patch to address the null pointer dereference in hugetlbfs_fill_super, followed by a system reboot to load the patched kernel. Consider kernel version compatibility testing in non-production environments prior to deployment.
Upgrade to kernel version 5.4.271 (for 5.4.x branch), 5.10.212 (for 5.10.x branch), 5.15.151 (for 5.15.x branch), or 6.1.79 (for 6.1.x branch) or later
- Back up current system data and verify you have a known-good kernel to fall back to
- For RHEL 8.0: Run 'dnf update kernel' or 'yum update kernel' to apply the latest kernel security fix
- For RHEL 9.0: Run 'dnf update kernel' or 'yum update kernel' to apply the latest kernel security fix
- For upstream Linux: Upgrade kernel to version 5.4.271, 5.10.212, 5.15.151, or 6.1.79 or later
- Reboot the system to load the updated kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking 'uname -r' and confirming the version is >= the fixed version for your branch
- Confirm the hugetlbfs module loads correctly with 'modprobe hugetlbfs' if needed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-0841 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-0841 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data