CVE-2024-10442
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOff-by-one error vulnerability in the transmission component in Synology Replication Service before 1.0.12-0066, 1.2.2-0353 and 1.3.0-0423 and Synology Unified Controller (DSMUC) before 3.1.4-23079 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to a broader impact across the system via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn off-by-one error in the transmission component of Synology Replication Service (versions before 1.0.12-0066, 1.2.2-0353, 1.3.0-0423) and Synology Unified Controller (before 3.1.4-23079) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability stems from incorrect bounds checking in the transmission handling logic, which can be exploited to overwrite memory boundaries and achieve code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.1.4-23079<= 1.0.12-0066< 1.2.2-0353< 1.3.0-0423CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Synology Unified Controller versionAccess DSM and navigate to Control Panel > Update & Restore > DSM Update, or check the version via the help menu (Help > About). Record the full version number including the build number (e.g., 3.1.4-23079).Affected if The installed version is less than 3.1.4-23079.
-
Identify installed Synology Replication Service versionOpen Package Center in DSM, locate Synology Replication Service in the installed packages list, and note the version number shown.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.12-0066 or lower, or is between 1.0.12-0067 and 1.2.2-0352, or is between 1.2.2-0353 and 1.3.0-0422.
-
Verify if Replication Service is currently enabledOpen Storage Manager or the replication service settings panel in DSM and confirm whether the replication service is actively running or enabled for any replication tasks.Affected if The replication service is running or enabled, and the version falls within any of the affected ranges.
-
Check network exposure of replication service portsAccess DSM Control Panel > Security > Firewall and review the firewall rules. Identify any rules allowing inbound access to the ports used by the replication service (commonly port 5550 or configured replication ports).Affected if The replication service ports are open to untrusted networks or the internet, and the service version is vulnerable.
You are affected if Synology Unified Controller is below version 3.1.4-23079 or Synology Replication Service is at or below 1.0.12-0066, below 1.2.2-0353, or below 1.3.0-0423, AND the replication service is enabled and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.2-03531.3.0-04233.1.4-23079
Update Synology Replication Service to version 1.0.12-0066, 1.2.2-0353, or 1.3.0-0423 (depending on your release line) and DSMUC to version 3.1.4-23079 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the replication service ports and disable the service if not required.
Unified Controller: 3.1.4-23079 or later; Replication Service: 1.0.12-0066, 1.2.2-0353, or 1.3.0-0423 (depending on branch)
- 1. Identify the exact version of Synology Unified Controller (DSMUC) currently installed
- 2. Identify the exact version of Synology Replication Service currently installed
- 3. For Unified Controller: Upgrade to version 3.1.4-23079 or later
- 4. For Replication Service versions <= 1.0.12-0066: Upgrade to version 1.0.12-0066 or later (or migrate to a supported branch)
- 5. For Replication Service versions > 1.0.12-0066 but < 1.2.2-0353: Upgrade to version 1.2.2-0353 or later
- 6. For Replication Service versions >= 1.2.2-0353 but < 1.3.0-0423: Upgrade to version 1.3.0-0423 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version numbers are correctly reported in the Synology admin interface
- 8. Test that replication functionality continues to work as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10442 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10442 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data