CVE-2022-43931
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Remote Desktop Functionality in Synology VPN Plus Server before 1.4.3-0534 and 1.4.4-0635 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the Remote Desktop functionality of Synology VPN Plus Server. The flaw allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on affected systems by writing data beyond allocated memory boundaries. Versions prior to 1.4.3-0534 and 1.4.4-0635 are vulnerable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.4.3-0534< 1.4.4-0635CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify VPN Plus Server is installedCheck if the Synology VPN Plus Server package is installed on the system. In the Synology DSM interface, open Package Center and look for 'VPN Plus Server' in the installed packages list, or run 'pkginfo | grep -i vpn' via SSH.Affected if VPN Plus Server package is installed and appears in the package list
-
Check installed VPN Plus Server versionLocate the installed version of VPN Plus Server. In Package Center, click on VPN Plus Server and view the version information. Alternatively, run 'pkginfo -l synology-vpnplus' or check the package details via 'cat /var/packages/vpn_plus_server/info' if available.Affected if The displayed version is earlier than 1.4.3-0534 AND earlier than 1.4.4-0635 (vulnerable if either condition is true)
-
Identify if Remote Desktop service is activeDetermine whether the Remote Desktop functionality within VPN Plus Server is enabled. Check the VPN Plus Server configuration via the web interface under the Remote Desktop section, or list running processes related to VPN Plus using 'ps aux | grep -i vpn' or 'ls -la /var/packages/vpn_plus_server/scripts/'Affected if Remote Desktop feature is provisioned, enabled, or the associated service process is running on the system
-
Verify network exposure of VPN Plus managementInspect network listening services to confirm VPN Plus Server ports are exposed. Use 'netstat -tulpn | grep -i vpn' or check firewall rules via 'iptables -L' to see which interfaces the VPN Plus services are bound to.Affected if VPN Plus Server Remote Desktop service is listening on a network-facing interface (not localhost only)
A system is affected if VPN Plus Server is installed with a version prior to 1.4.3-0534 (or prior to 1.4.4-0635) AND the Remote Desktop functionality is enabled or accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.3-05341.4.4-0635
Apply vendor-supplied updates to Synology VPN Plus Server versions 1.4.3-0534 or 1.4.4-0635 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting network access to VPN Plus Server management interfaces.
VPN Plus Server 1.4.3-0534 or 1.4.4-0635 (depending on installed branch)
- 1. Log into Synology DSM and navigate to Package Center
- 2. Locate VPN Plus Server in the installed package list
- 3. Check the current version number to determine which upgrade path applies
- 4. If using version 1.4.3.x branch, upgrade to version 1.4.3-0534 or later
- 5. If using version 1.4.4.x branch, upgrade to version 1.4.4-0635 or later
- 6. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the package version in Package Center
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43931 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43931 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data