CVE-2024-11253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA post-authentication command injection vulnerability in the "DNSServer” parameter of the diagnostic function in the Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware version V5.50(ABOM.8.5)C0 and earlier could allow an authenticated attacker with administrator privileges to execute operating system (OS) commands on a vulnerable device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA post-authentication command injection vulnerability exists in the DNSServer parameter of the diagnostic function in Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware V5.50(ABOM.8.5)C0 and earlier. An authenticated attacker with administrator privileges can inject and execute arbitrary OS commands on the device through insufficient input validation of the DNSServer parameter.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.50\(abom.8.5\)c0<= 5.17\(acbs.1\)c0<= 5.50\(abom.8.5\)c0<= 5.15\(abqa.2.3\)c0<= 5.15\(abqa.2.3\)c0<= 5.50\(abom.8.5\)c0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelLocate the device model number on the device label or in the web interface (typically under Status, System Info, or General Setup pages)Affected if Device model is not one of the listed affected models (Emg5723 T50k, Dm4200 B0, Vmg3927 T50k, Vmg4005 B50a, Vmg4005 B60a, Vmg8825 T50k)
-
Check firmware versionFind the firmware version in the device web interface (usually under Administration, Firmware Upgrade, or Status pages) or via CLI command like 'cat /etc/zyfwinfo' or 'version'Affected if Firmware version is at or below 5.50(abom.8.5)c0 for T50k models, 5.17(acbs.1)c0 for Dm4200 B0, or 5.15(abqa.2.3)c0 for Vmg4005 models
-
Verify diagnostic function accessibilityLocate the diagnostic function in the web interface (typically under Maintenance, Diagnostics, Tools, or Network Diagnostics) and confirm it is accessible to administrator-level usersAffected if Diagnostic function is exposed and accessible without additional access controls
-
Inspect DNSServer parameterAccess the diagnostic function and examine the DNSServer parameter field (often found in DNS or network diagnostic settings) for unexpected characters or patterns that may indicate injectionAffected if DNSServer parameter accepts and processes shell metacharacters or executes input as commands
The device is affected if it is one of the listed Zyxel models running a firmware version at or below the specified threshold AND the diagnostic function with DNSServer parameter is accessible to administrator users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the Zyxel VMG8825-T50K firmware to a version beyond V5.50(ABOM.8.5)C0. If no update is available, restrict administrator access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious diagnostic tool usage.
Latest firmware version available from Zyxel for your specific model (must be higher than the affected versions: 5.50(abom.8.5)c0 for T50k models, 5.17(acbs.1)c0 for Dm4200 B0, 5.15(abqa.2.3)c0 for Vmg4005 models)
- 1. Identify the exact model number of your Zyxel device from the affected list (Emg5723 T50k, Dm4200 B0, Vmg3927 T50k, Vmg4005 B50a, Vmg4005 B60a, or Vmg8825 T50k)
- 2. Check the current firmware version on the device through the web management interface or CLI
- 3. Visit the official Zyxel support website (www.zyxel.com) and navigate to the firmware download section for your specific model
- 4. Download the latest available firmware version for your device
- 5. Back up the current device configuration before upgrading
- 6. Upload and install the new firmware following Zyxel's standard firmware upgrade procedure
- 7. After upgrade, verify the device is functioning correctly and the new firmware version is applied
- 8. Restore the configuration if needed and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-11253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-11253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data