CVE-2024-2013
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server / API Gateway component that if exploited allows attackers without any access to interact with the services and the post-authentication attack surface.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuthentication bypass vulnerability in FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server API Gateway allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms and directly interact with backend services and the post-authentication attack surface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= r15a= r15b= r16a= r16b= r15a= r15b= r16bCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Foxman-UN or UNEM is installedLocate and inspect the installed Hitachienergy Foxman-UN or UNEM installation. Check system inventory, installed software list, or product documentation for presence of these products.Affected if The product is not found on the system, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Determine installed product versionUse product-specific command, configuration file, or management interface to retrieve the exact version number of Foxman-UN or UNEM.Affected if Installed version matches r15a, r15b, r16a, or r16b for Foxman-UN, or r15a, r15b, or r16b for UNEM.
-
Verify API Gateway component is in useCheck product configuration or architecture documentation to confirm the API Gateway component is deployed and active.Affected if API Gateway is deployed and accessible as part of the installation.
-
Assess network exposure of API GatewayReview network configuration, firewall rules, or access control lists to determine if the API Gateway is reachable from network segments accessible to unauthenticated attackers.Affected if API Gateway is exposed to untrusted networks without additional authentication barriers.
User is affected if Foxman-UN (r15a/r15b/r16a/r16b) or UNEM (r15a/r15b/r16b) with an exposed API Gateway is installed in their environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patch or update to the FOXMAN-UN/UNEM server/API Gateway. If no patch is available, restrict network exposure of the affected component and implement additional authentication layers as a temporary workaround.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2013 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2013 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data