Firepower Management CenterApplication · Cisco

CVE-2024-20372

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-10-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting crafted input into various data fields in an affected interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface, or access sensitive, browser-based information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can inject malicious script into various data fields, which is then stored and executed when viewed by legitimate users, allowing arbitrary code execution in the browser context or access to sensitive browser-based information.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Cisco's security advisory; in the interim, restrict access to the FMC web interface to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious input patterns in data fields.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Firepower Management CenterApplication
Affected:= 6.4.0.17= 6.4.0.18= 6.6.7.2= 7.0.6.1= 7.0.6.2= 7.2.5.1= 7.2.5.2= 7.2.6= 7.2.7= 7.2.8= 7.2.8.1= 7.4.0
Secure Firewall Management CenterApplication
Affected:= 6.2.3= 6.2.3.1= 6.2.3.2= 6.2.3.3= 6.2.3.4= 6.2.3.5= 6.2.3.6= 6.2.3.7= 6.2.3.8= 6.2.3.9= 6.2.3.10= 6.2.3.11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed FMC software version
    Log into the FMC web interface and navigate to System > About > Updates, or run 'show version' via CLI to retrieve the installed software version
    Affected if Version matches any of these: 6.4.0.17, 6.4.0.18, 6.6.7.2, 7.0.6.1, 7.0.6.2, 7.2.5.1, 7.2.5.2, 7.2.6, 7.2.7, 7.2.8, 7.2.8.1, 7.4.0 for Firepower Management Center; or 6.2.3 through 6.2.3.11 for Secure Firewall Management Center
  2. Determine web interface exposure
    Review network access controls and firewall rules to determine if the FMC web management interface (HTTPS ports 443/8443) is accessible from untrusted networks
    Affected if The FMC web interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted internal networks without proper access restrictions
  3. Inspect stored data fields for injected scripts
    Review database entries or exported configuration data for any unexpected script tags, javascript: URIs, or HTML event handlers in fields such as device names, policy descriptions, object names, or user-defined text fields
    Affected if Any stored data fields contain suspicious patterns like <script>, javascript:, onload=, onerror=, or other XSS payloads that were not intentionally inserted by administrators
  4. Examine browser execution context
    Access the FMC web interface using a browser with developer tools, navigate to various management pages, and inspect the DOM for any unexpected script execution or injected content in the user interface
    Affected if Scripts execute automatically or injected content appears in the UI when viewing normally managed pages without manually triggering any user actions

You are affected if your FMC version matches the listed affected versions AND the web interface is accessible to potential attackers, regardless of whether you can currently detect injected scripts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Cisco's security advisory; in the interim, restrict access to the FMC web interface to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious input patterns in data fields.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to FMC versions 6.4.0.19 or later (for 6.4.x), 6.7.0 or later (for 6.6.x), 7.1.0 or later (for 7.0.x), or 6.2.3.4 or later (for 6.2.3.x)

  1. 1. Access the Firepower Management Center web-based management interface
  2. 2. Navigate to System > Updates > Product Updates to check for available updates
  3. 3. Download and install the latest Cisco FMC software version that includes the fix for CVE-2024-20372
  4. 4. Alternatively, download the security update from the Cisco Software Download Center (software.cisco.com)
  5. 5. Before upgrading, backup the FMC configuration via System > Configuration > Database Backup
  6. 6. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may require brief downtime
  7. 7. Install the upgrade following Cisco's standard FMC upgrade procedure
  8. 8. After upgrade, verify the system is functioning normally and the vulnerability is remediated
Caveat Standard Cisco FMC upgrade risks apply - ensure backup and test in staging environment before production deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Firepower Management Center Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20372 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20372 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data