CVE-2024-20386
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by inserting crafted input into various data fields in an affected interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface, or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Cisco Firepower Management Center web-based management interface due to insufficient input validation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject malicious script payloads into data fields that persist and execute when users interact with the affected interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.4.0.17= 6.4.0.18= 6.6.7.2= 7.0.6.1= 7.0.6.2= 7.2.5.1= 7.2.5.2= 7.2.6= 7.2.7= 7.2.8= 7.2.8.1= 7.4.0= 6.2.3= 6.2.3.1= 6.2.3.2= 6.2.3.3= 6.2.3.4= 6.2.3.5= 6.2.3.6= 6.2.3.7= 6.2.3.8= 6.2.3.9= 6.2.3.10= 6.2.3.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FMC product and versionLog into the Firepower Management Center web interface and navigate to System > About > Updates, or run 'show version' via CLI to determine the exact version numberAffected if The installed version matches any version listed in the affected versions for either Cisco Firepower Management Center or Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
-
Confirm web interface accessibilityDetermine if the FMC web-based management interface is reachable from network locations outside the trusted internal networkAffected if The FMC web interface is exposed to untrusted or external networks (internet-accessible or reachable from less-trusted segments)
-
Review recent system logs for XSS indicatorsCheck FMC logs in System > Monitoring > Logs for entries containing script tags (<script>), javascript:, or other HTML injection patterns in user-definable fields such as device names, policies, or custom objectsAffected if Logs contain unexpected HTML, JavaScript, or script tag content in fields where only plain text should exist
-
Audit user-created objects and policiesReview any user-created policy objects, custom application detectors, or network objects via the web interface for unexpected JavaScript code or suspicious URL patternsAffected if Any stored objects contain malicious script payloads that could execute when viewed by other users
A user is affected if the installed FMC version matches any of the listed affected versions AND the web interface is accessible (which is required for the XSS to be triggered).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco patch/更新 for CVE-2024-20386 when available; until then, limit FMC interface exposure to trusted networks and monitor for suspicious user activity.
Contact Cisco TAC for the specific fixed release for your FMC version branch (6.2.3.x, 6.4.0.x, 6.6.x, or 7.0.x)
- 1. Contact Cisco TAC or check the Cisco Firepower Management Center security advisory at sec.cloudapps.cisco.com for the specific fixed software release
- 2. Prior to upgrade, back up the FMC configuration
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window following Cisco's upgrade procedure for FMC
- 4. Upgrade the Firepower Management Center to the fixed release as specified in the Cisco security advisory
- 5. After upgrade, verify the web interface is functional and the XSS vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20386 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20386 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data