CVE-2024-20412
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software for Cisco Firepower 1000, 2100, 3100, and 4200 Series could allow an unauthenticated, local attacker to access an affected system using static credentials. This vulnerability is due to the presence of static accounts with hard-coded passwords on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by logging in to the CLI of an affected device with these credentials. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access the affected system and retrieve sensitive information, perform limited troubleshooting actions, modify some configuration options, or render the device unable to boot to the operating system, requiring a reimage of the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco FTD software contains hard-coded static credentials for unauthenticated local CLI access on Firepower 1000, 2100, 3100, and 4200 Series devices. An attacker with CLI access can exploit these credentials to retrieve sensitive information, modify limited configuration options, or render the device unbootable, requiring reimaging.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1.0= 7.1.0.1= 7.1.0.2= 7.1.0.3= 7.2.0= 7.2.0.1= 7.2.1= 7.2.2= 7.2.3= 7.2.4= 7.2.4.1= 7.2.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FTD software versionLog into the Firepower device via SSH or console and run the command 'show version' or 'show running-config' to display the software version. Alternatively, access the Firepower Management Center and navigate to Devices > Device Management to view the version for each managed FTD device.Affected if The displayed version matches any of these exact versions: 7.1.0, 7.1.0.1, 7.1.0.2, 7.1.0.3, 7.2.0, 7.2.0.1, 7.2.1, 7.2.2, 7.2.3, 7.2.4, 7.2.4.1, or 7.2.5
-
Confirm device model is affected seriesFrom the same 'show version' output or Firepower Management Center device list, verify the hardware model is a Firepower 1000, 2100, 3100, or 4200 Series appliance.Affected if The device model is a Firepower 1000, 2100, 3100, or 4200 series and the version matches the affected list in step 1
-
Verify CLI access is enabledCheck if SSH or local console access to the FTD CLI is enabled by reviewing the device configuration. In the FTD CLI, run 'show ssh' to list enabled SSH interfaces, or check the management access configuration with 'show running-config | include ssh'.Affected if SSH or console access to the FTD device is enabled and the version/model conditions from steps 1-2 are met
A device is affected if it runs FTD version 7.1.0 through 7.2.5 (exact versions) on a Firepower 1000, 2100, 3100, or 4200 series appliance with CLI/SSH access enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco patch/update for FTD software as released in the Cisco Security Advisory; ensure no unauthorized accounts exist and validate device integrity post-patch.
Upgrade to a later FTD 7.1.x release (7.1.0.4 or later) or the next major release (e.g., 7.2.x/7.3.x) as specified in the Cisco FTD security advisory
- Verify the current FTD version using 'show version' command in the CLI
- Download the fixed FTD software release from Cisco (check Cisco Firepower Release Notes for the version that addresses CVE-2024-20412)
- Plan upgrade during a maintenance window as the device will require a reboot
- Backup current configuration using 'configure export' or via FMC if managed centrally
- Upload the new FTD image to the device using 'upgrade' command or via Firepower Management Center
- Verify upgrade completion and confirm new version with 'show version'
- Test basic connectivity and verify critical policies are functioning
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20412 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20412 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data