CVE-2024-20431
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the geolocation access control feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass an access control policy. This vulnerability is due to improper assignment of geolocation data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending traffic through an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass a geolocation-based access control policy and successfully send traffic to a protected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco FTD geolocation access control feature has a vulnerability where geolocation data is improperly assigned, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass geolocation-based access control policies by sending specially crafted traffic through the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.1= 7.0.1.1= 7.0.2= 7.0.2.1= 7.0.3= 7.0.4= 7.0.5= 7.0.6= 7.0.6.1= 7.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FTD software versionRun 'show version' or 'show system install summary' from the FTD CLI (via FMC or directly on FTD) to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The installed version matches any of: 7.0.0, 7.0.0.1, 7.0.1, 7.0.1.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.2.1, 7.0.3, 7.0.4, 7.0.5, 7.0.6, 7.0.6.1, or 7.1.0
-
Verify geolocation access control is in useAccess Firepower Management Center (FMC) and navigate to Policies > Access Control, or run 'show policy-map' on FTD CLI, to check if any access control policies have geolocation-based rules configuredAffected if Geolocation-based access control rules or policies are defined and active on the device
-
Inspect geolocation object configurationIn FMC, go to Objects > Geolocation, or run 'show running-config | include geo' on FTD CLI, to review configured geolocation objects and their assigned countries/regionsAffected if Geolocation objects are configured and associated with access control rules
-
Check for traffic pattern anomaliesReview FTD connection logs and security events via FMC (Analysis > Connections > Events) or run 'show connection' for unusual connection patterns that may indicate geolocation bypassAffected if Traffic from unexpected geolocations is being permitted despite geolocation-based deny rules
You are affected if your Cisco FTD runs version 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 and has geolocation access control policies configured, as the vulnerability allows bypass of these policies.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco security update for CVE-2024-20431 to the affected FTD software version; verify geolocation access control policies are functioning correctly after the update.
FTD 7.0.2 or later in the 7.0.x branch
- 1. Identify the current FTD version by navigating to System > Updates in the FTD management interface or running 'show version' via CLI
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade as FTD upgrades typically require a brief downtime
- 3. Download the fixed FTD software image (7.0.2 or later) from Cisco's Software Download center
- 4. Upload the new image to the FTD device via the management interface or SCP
- 5. Initiate the upgrade process via System > Updates > Install ISE or via CLI with 'upgrade add filename <image>' and 'upgrade install'
- 6. Verify successful upgrade by confirming the new version in 'show version' output
- 7. Verify the geolocation access control policy functions correctly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20431 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20431 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data