Identity Services EngineApplication · Cisco
CVE-2024-20469
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in specific CLI commands in Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform command injection attacks on the underlying operating system and elevate privileges to root. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid Administrator privileges on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted CLI command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability in Cisco ISE's CLI allows authenticated attackers with Administrator privileges to inject arbitrary OS commands and escalate to root. The flaw exists due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input in specific CLI commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Identity Services EngineApplication
= 3.2.0= 3.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco ISE versionLog into the Cisco ISE admin UI and navigate to Administration > System > Settings > Product Version, or run 'show version' in the CLIAffected if The installed version is 3.2.0 or 3.3.0 specifically (not later patched versions)
-
Confirm CLI access is enabledCheck if CLI access is enabled in Cisco ISE by reviewing access settings in the admin UI under Administration > System > Admin Access > Access MethodsAffected if CLI access is enabled and the version matches 3.2.0 or 3.3.0
-
Review Administrator accounts with CLI privilegesNavigate to Administration > Identity Management > Identities > Users in the admin UI to list Administrator accounts, then verify which have CLI access under Administration > System > Admin Access > AdministratorsAffected if Any Administrator accounts exist in a vulnerable version with CLI access enabled
-
Inspect CLI audit logs for suspicious commandsReview CLI audit logs in the admin UI under Operations > Reports > Generated Reports > CLI Audit Logs, looking for unexpected commands or privilege escalation patternsAffected if Unusual or injected commands appear in CLI logs indicating exploitation attempts
-
Check for unexpected root-level processes or file modificationsReview system logs and file integrity monitoring tools for new or modified system files, unusual processes, or unexpected scripts in /tmp or other writable directoriesAffected if Evidence of root-level command execution or unauthorized system changes is found
A system is affected if it runs Cisco ISE version 3.2.0 or 3.3.0 with CLI access enabled for Administrator accounts, regardless of whether exploitation is confirmed in logs
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco's available patches for CVE-2024-20469; restrict CLI access to trusted Administrators only and monitor for suspicious command execution.
Fix this in Identity Services Engine
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20469 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data