CVE-2024-20474
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) processing of Cisco Secure Client Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) of Cisco Secure Client. This vulnerability is due to an integer underflow condition. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted IKEv2 packet to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause Cisco Secure Client Software to crash, resulting in a DoS condition on the client software. Note: Cisco Secure Client Software releases 4.10 and earlier were known as Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an integer underflow vulnerability in IKEv2 packet processing within Cisco Secure Client (formerly Cisco AnyConnect). An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted IKEv2 packet to trigger the underflow, causing the client software to crash and result in a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.9.00086= 4.9.01095= 4.9.02028= 4.9.03047= 4.9.03049= 4.9.04043= 4.9.04053= 4.9.05042= 4.9.06037= 4.10.00093= 4.10.01075= 4.10.02086= 4.10.03104= 4.10.04065= 4.10.04071= 4.10.05085= 4.10.05095= 4.10.05111= 4.10.06079= 4.10.06090= 4.10.07061CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco VPN client versionOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features, look for 'Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client' or 'Cisco Secure Client' and note the version number. Alternatively, run 'vpncli.exe -v' or 'vpn --version' from the client installation directory.Affected if The installed version matches any of these: 4.9.00086, 4.9.01095, 4.9.02028, 4.9.03047, 4.9.03049, 4.9.04043, 4.9.04053, 4.9.05042, 4.9.06037, 4.10.00093, 4.10.01075, 4.10.02086, 4.10.03104, 4.10.04065, 4.10.04071, 4.10.05085, 4.10.05095, 4.10.05111, 4.10.06079, 4.10.06090, 4.10.07061
-
Verify IKEv2 VPN profile is configuredCheck the client's profile XML files in the profile directory (typically C:\ProgramData\Cisco\Cisco Secure Client\profiles\ or within the client UI under Profile Management). Look for a profile with <Protocol>IKEv2</Protocol> or similar IKEv2 configuration.Affected if An IKEv2 VPN profile exists and is available for connection, as the vulnerability is triggered during IKEv2 packet processing.
-
Confirm client is running or configured for auto-connectCheck if the Cisco client service (Cisco AnyConnect Service or Cisco Secure Client Service) is running, or if the client is set to auto-connect on system startup.Affected if The client is active and capable of receiving IKEv2 packets from a VPN server, making it reachable for exploitation.
You are affected if your installed Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client or Cisco Secure Client version matches one of the listed versions AND you have an IKEv2 VPN profile configured, as the integer underflow triggers when processing a specially crafted IKEv2 packet.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch for Cisco Secure Client when released. Until then, limit exposure by avoiding untrusted VPN connections and monitoring for client crashes.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20474 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data