CVE-2024-20494
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the TLS cryptography functionality of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper data validation during the TLS 1.3 handshake. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted TLS 1.3 packet to an affected system through a TLS 1.3-enabled listening socket. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. Note: This vulnerability can also impact the integrity of a device by causing VPN HostScan communication failures or file transfer failures when Cisco ASA Software is upgraded using Cisco Adaptive Security Device Manager (ASDM).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA data validation vulnerability in the TLS 1.3 handshake processing of Cisco ASA and FTD software allows unauthenticated remote attackers to send crafted TLS 1.3 packets that cause unexpected device reloads, resulting in denial of service. The flaw can also disrupt VPN HostScan communication and file transfers during ASDM upgrades.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.19.1= 9.19.1.5= 9.19.1.9= 9.19.1.12= 9.19.1.18= 9.19.1.22= 9.19.1.24= 9.19.1.27= 9.19.1.28= 9.19.1.31= 9.20.1= 9.20.1.5= 7.3.0= 7.3.1= 7.3.1.1= 7.3.1.2= 7.4.0= 7.4.1= 7.4.1.1= 7.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check ASA software versionRun `show version` on the ASA CLI and locate the 'Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software' version lineAffected if Version matches any of: 9.19.1, 9.19.1.5, 9.19.1.9, 9.19.1.12, 9.19.1.18, 9.19.1.22, 9.19.1.24, 9.19.1.27, 9.19.1.28, 9.19.1.31, 9.20.1, or 9.20.1.5
-
Check FTD software versionRun `show version` on the FTD device CLI and locate the 'Cisco Firepower Threat Defense' version lineAffected if Version matches any of: 7.3.0, 7.3.1, 7.3.1.1, 7.3.1.2, 7.4.0, 7.4.1, 7.4.1.1, or 7.4.2
-
Verify TLS 1.3 is enabled on ASARun `show run all ssl` or `show ssl <interface>` to inspect SSL/TLS configuration. Look for 'version tlsv1.3' in the outputAffected if TLS 1.3 is listed as enabled on any interface (the vulnerability requires TLS 1.3 to be active)
-
Verify TLS 1.3 is enabled on FTDAccess the Firepower Management Center or run `show ssl` CLI command to check SSL profiles. Look for TLS 1.3 configuration in SSL policy settingsAffected if TLS 1.3 is configured in any SSL profile or policy
A device is affected if it runs an affected ASA or FTD version AND has TLS 1.3 enabled on at least one interface; devices without TLS 1.3 enabled are not vulnerable to this flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Cisco security update (software patch) for ASA/FTD. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting TLS 1.3 exposure or implementing additional network-level controls to limit exposure to unauthenticated TLS traffic.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20494 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20494 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data