Identity Services EngineApplication · Cisco

CVE-2024-20525

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an XSS attack against a user of the interface. This vulnerability exists because the web-based management interface does not properly validate user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco ISE's web-based management interface allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted URLs. The interface fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input, enabling script execution in the victim's browser context when they click a malicious link.

MitigationApply the Cisco ISE security patch when available. Users should be warned not to click untrusted links. Consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Identity Services EngineApplication
Affected:= 3.0.0= 3.1.0= 3.2.0= 3.3.0= 3.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Cisco ISE management interface is accessible
    Check if TCP ports 443, 8443, or the configured management ports are open and reachable for the ISE web UI
    Affected if The management interface is externally or internally accessible to potential attackers
  2. Identify installed Cisco ISE version via web interface
    Log into the Cisco ISE administrative web UI and navigate to Administration > System > Settings > Product Version, or check the login page footer for version information
    Affected if Version displayed matches 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, 3.3.0, or 3.4.0 exactly
  3. Identify installed Cisco ISE version via CLI
    SSH or console into the ISE node and run the command 'show version' or 'show application version ise'
    Affected if Version output shows 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, 3.3.0, or 3.4.0 exactly
  4. Confirm patch status
    In the ISE web UI, navigate to Administration > System > Maintenance > Patch Set or check Cisco ISE release notes for your specific version to see if a post-version patch has been applied
    Affected if No security patch for CVE-2024-20525 has been installed on the affected version

Your environment is affected if Cisco ISE version 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, 3.3.0, or 3.4.0 is running AND the web-based management interface is accessible to users who could click malicious crafted URLs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco ISE security patch when available. Users should be warned not to click untrusted links. Consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface.

Fix this in Identity Services Engine Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20525 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20525 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data