CVE-2024-20537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to bypass the authorization mechanisms for specific administrative functions. This vulnerability is due to a lack of server-side validation of Administrator permissions. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted HTTP request to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct administrative functions beyond their intended access level. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need Read-Only Administrator credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authorization bypass vulnerability in Cisco ISE's web-based management interface where server-side validation of Administrator permissions is missing. An authenticated attacker with Read-Only Administrator credentials can submit crafted HTTP requests to perform administrative functions beyond their authorized access level, achieving vertical privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.0= 3.1.0= 3.2.0= 3.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco ISE is presentIdentify if Cisco Identity Services Engine is installed by checking for ISE services, the ISE admin web portal, or reviewing installed software on the systemAffected if Cisco ISE is found in the environment
-
Check the installed versionLog into the ISE web interface and navigate to Administration > System > Server Settings, or use the CLI command 'show version' to determine the exact version numberAffected if The version is exactly 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, or 3.3.0
-
Verify web management interface is enabledConfirm the ISE admin web interface is accessible by checking that the service is running and reachable on the configured ports (typically 443 or 8443)Affected if The ISE web management interface is active and running
-
Identify Read-Only Administrator accountsIn the ISE web interface, go to Administration > Identity Management > Identities > Users to review user accounts, or use the CLI to list administrators and their assigned privilege levelsAffected if Read-Only Administrator accounts exist in the system
The environment is affected if Cisco ISE version 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.0, or 3.3.0 is running with the web management interface accessible and Read-Only Administrator accounts are configured, allowing authenticated attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco's official patch when available. As an interim control, restrict network access to the ISE web management interface to trusted admin networks only to reduce attack surface.
Cisco ISE 3.3.1 or later (or 3.4.0 if released)
- 1. Log in to the Cisco ISE admin web interface
- 2. Navigate to Administration > System > Settings > Server Certificate to backup current configuration
- 3. Download and review the Cisco ISE 3.3.1 or later release notes and security advisory for this CVE
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window during low-traffic period
- 5. Apply the software update following Cisco ISE upgrade procedures: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/3-3/upgrade_guide/b_ISE_Upgrade_33.html
- 6. After upgrade, verify the patch is applied by checking the ISE version under Administration > System > Version
- 7. Confirm Read-Only Administrator accounts can no longer perform elevated administrative actions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-20537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-20537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data