CVE-2024-21038
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated HTTP vulnerability in the LOV (List of Values) component of Oracle E-Business Suite's Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul module (versions 12.2.3-12.2.13). Allows unauthenticated attackers network access via HTTP to achieve unauthorized read and limited write/delete access to a subset of application data. Requires human interaction from a person other than the attacker.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.2.3, <= 12.2.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Oracle E-Business Suite installationAccess the E-Business Suite login page or check for Oracle-specific HTTP endpoints (typically on ports 8000-8008, 9000-9008). Look for Oracle E-Business Suite branding or error pages that reference Oracle applications.Affected if Oracle E-Business Suite is accessible via HTTP on any port.
-
Identify E-Business Suite versionView the login page source or footer for version information, or access the OA_HTML/AppsLogin page which typically displays the version. Alternatively, query the database for the release version: SELECT release_name FROM apps.fnd_product_groups;Affected if The displayed or queried version falls within the range 12.2.3 to 12.2.13.
-
Verify CMRO module is installedLog into Oracle Applications Manager (OAM) or use the Responsibility: Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Check if this responsibility is listed in the assigned responsibilities for any user, or query: SELECT * FROM fnd_responsibility WHERE responsibility_key LIKE '%CMRO%' OR responsibility_key LIKE '%MAINTENANCE%REPAIR%';Affected if The CMRO or MRO responsibility exists and is assignable in the system.
-
Check if LOV component is exposedAttempt to access the LOV function directly via a URL pattern such as: /OA_HTML/rcwlovr.jsp? LovName=... or /OA_HTML/lov.jsp. These are common LOV entry points in Oracle E-Business Suite.Affected if The LOV component returns a page or accepts parameters without requiring authentication.
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules, load balancer configurations, or WebLogic/Oracle HTTP Server settings to determine if the E-Business Suite HTTP ports are exposed to untrusted networks or the public internet.Affected if HTTP ports for E-Business Suite are reachable from networks outside the trusted internal network, or from unauthenticated users.
A system is affected if Oracle E-Business Suite version 12.2.3 through 12.2.13 is running with the CMRO module installed and its HTTP interfaces (including the LOV component) are accessible to unauthenticated network attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2024 containing the fix for CVE-2024-21038. If patching is delayed, restrict network access to Oracle E-Business Suite HTTP endpoints.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-21038 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-21038 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data