CVE-2024-23110
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, 6.2.0 through 6.2.15, 6.0 all versions allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted commands
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiOS allows attackers to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests. The flaw exists in the handling of certain commands, where insufficient bounds checking on stack-allocated buffers permits overflowing adjacent memory and overwriting return addresses. This can lead to arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.16>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.15>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.14>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.7>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the FortiOS versionRun 'get system status' via CLI or check the FortiOS dashboard firmware version display. Compare the installed version against the affected ranges: 6.0.0 to 6.2.15, 6.4.0 to 6.4.14, 7.0.0 to 7.0.13, 7.2.0 to 7.2.6, and 7.4.0 to 7.4.2.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges.
-
Verify HTTP/HTTPS management interface exposureCheck firewall policies and interface settings to determine if the FortiOS GUI (HTTP port 80/HTTPS port 443) or CLI management ports are reachable from untrusted networks or the internet. Review the 'system interface' configuration and 'firewall policy' settings.Affected if HTTP or HTTPS management access is permitted from untrusted IP addresses or external networks.
-
Review administrative access policiesInspect the administrative access list under 'System > Network > Interfaces' or via 'show system interface' CLI command to list all interfaces with HTTP, HTTPS, SSH, or Telnet access enabled.Affected if Administrative protocols (HTTP/HTTPS) are enabled on external or untrusted-facing interfaces.
-
Check for trusted host restrictionsExamine the admin user configuration via 'show system admin' CLI command to verify if trusted host IP restrictions are defined for administrative accounts.Affected if No trusted host restrictions are configured, or the defined trusted hosts include broad/untrusted IP ranges.
You are affected if your FortiOS version is 6.0.0-6.2.15, 6.4.0-6.4.14, 7.0.0-7.0.13, 7.2.0-7.2.6, or 7.4.0-7.4.2 AND the management interface is accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.166.4.157.0.14
Apply the relevant FortiOS firmware update from Fortinet's security advisory. For affected versions (7.4.x, 7.2.x, 7.0.x, 6.4.x, 6.2.x, 6.0.x), upgrade to the patched versions as specified in the Fortinet PSIRT advisory. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict management interface access to trusted IP addresses via firewall policies or VPN.
Upgrade to FortiOS 6.2.16 (or 6.4.15, 7.0.14, or 7.2.7 depending on your current branch; for 7.4.x deployments upgrade to 7.4.3 or later)
- 1. Identify the current FortiOS version by running 'get system status' or 'fwsm -get system status' on the FortiGate CLI
- 2. Determine which version branch your current installation belongs to (6.0.x, 6.2.x, 6.4.x, 7.0.x, or 7.2.x)
- 3. For FortiOS 6.0.x/6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.16 or later
- 4. For FortiOS 6.4.x: Upgrade to version 6.4.15 or later
- 5. For FortiOS 7.0.x: Upgrade to version 7.0.14 or later
- 6. For FortiOS 7.2.x: Upgrade to version 7.2.7 or later
- 7. Download the appropriate firmware from Fortinet's support portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
- 8. Upload and install the firmware via the FortiGate GUI (System > Firmware) or CLI using 'execute firmware upgrade'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23110 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23110 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data