CVE-2024-23794
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in the inline editing functionality of OTRS can lead to privilege escalation. This flaw allows an agent with read-only permissions to gain full access to a ticket. This issue arises in very rare instances when an admin has previously enabled the setting 'RequiredLock' of 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' in the system configuration.This issue affects OTRS: * 8.0.X * 2023.X * from 2024.X through 2024.4.x
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOTRS contains an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability in its inline editing feature. When an administrator enables the 'RequiredLock' setting for 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' in system configuration, a read-only agent can escalate privileges to gain full access to tickets. This bypasses the intended permission model in rare, configuration-specific scenarios.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 2024.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OTRS version is within affected rangeCheck the installed OTRS version via admin panel (Admin > System Administration > System Information) or by examining the VERSION file in the OTRS root directoryAffected if Version is greater than or equal to 8.0.0 AND less than 2024.5.2
-
Locate the InlineEditing configuration for Watch propertyNavigate to SysConfig (Admin > System Administration > SysConfig) and search for 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch'Affected if The configuration entry exists and is accessible in SysConfig
-
Check RequiredLock setting statusWithin the 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' SysConfig entry, inspect the 'RequiredLock' settingAffected if RequiredLock is set to enabled, checked, or 'Yes' (any value that enables the lock requirement)
-
Confirm role-based access controlsVerify that the affected OTRS instance has read-only agents defined in Admin > Agents who would have their permissions altered by this configurationAffected if Read-only agent roles exist in the system and the RequiredLock setting is enabled
A system is affected if it runs OTRS version 8.0.0 through 2024.5.1 AND has the RequiredLock setting enabled for the AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.5.2
Administrators should disable the 'RequiredLock' setting for 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' in system configuration, or upgrade to a patched version of OTRS.
2024.5.2 or later
- Backup the current OTRS installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade
- Review OTRS upgrade documentation for your current version to ensure compatibility
- Upgrade OTRS to version 2024.5.2 or later (the first fixed release)
- After upgrade, verify the version number matches the expected fixed release
- Test that the inline editing functionality works correctly and that the privilege escalation vulnerability is resolved
- Optionally, review the system configuration setting 'AgentFrontend::Ticket::InlineEditing::Property###Watch' to ensure it is set appropriately
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-23794 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-23794 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data