CVE-2024-26006
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of input during web page Generation vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiOS version 7.4.3 and below, version 7.2.7 and below, version 7.0.13 and below and FortiProxy version 7.4.3 and below, version 7.2.9 and below, version 7.0.16 and below web SSL VPN UI may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform a Cross-Site Scripting attack via a malicious samba server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site scripting vulnerability in FortiOS and FortiProxy SSL VPN web interface allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via a malicious samba server. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation in the web page generation process (CWE-79).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.0.14>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.8>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.4>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.17>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.10>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed productRun 'get system status' or 'diag sys version' via FortiOS/FortiProxy CLI to confirm whether the device runs FortiOS or FortiProxy.Affected if The device is running FortiOS or FortiProxy firmware.
-
Determine the firmware versionExecute 'get system status' in the CLI and locate the 'FortiOS' or 'FortiProxy' version field, for example: FortiOS v7.2.5.Affected if The version is within any of the affected ranges: FortiOS >= 6.4.0 and < 7.0.14, >= 7.2.0 and < 7.2.8, >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.4; or FortiProxy >= 7.0.0 and < 7.0.17, >= 7.2.0 and < 7.2.10, >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.4.
-
Verify SSL VPN web interface is enabledRun 'get vpn ssl settings' in the CLI and check if 'status' is enabled or if web-mode is configured.Affected if SSL VPN web interface is actively enabled on the device.
-
Review logs for suspicious samba server connectionsExecute 'execute log filter category 23' followed by 'execute log display' or check GUI logs for connections from unexpected SMB/samba servers to the SSL VPN portal.Affected if Logs show connections from unknown or untrusted samba servers to the SSL VPN interface.
The device is affected if it runs FortiOS or FortiProxy within the listed version ranges AND has SSL VPN web interface enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.147.0.177.2.8
Upgrade to FortiOS 7.4.4/7.2.8/7.0.14 or later, and FortiProxy 7.4.4/7.2.10/7.0.17 or later. Until patched, restrict access to SSL VPN and monitor for suspicious samba server connections.
FortiOS: 7.4.4+ / 7.2.8+ / 7.0.14+ | FortiProxy: 7.4.4+ / 7.2.10+ / 7.0.17+
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiOS or FortiProxy version using the web UI or CLI command 'get system status'
- 2. Determine which version branch you are running (7.0.x, 7.2.x, or 7.4.x)
- 3. For FortiOS 7.4.x users: Upgrade to FortiOS 7.4.4 or later
- 4. For FortiOS 7.2.x users: Upgrade to FortiOS 7.2.8 or later
- 5. For FortiOS 7.0.x users: Upgrade to FortiOS 7.0.14 or later
- 6. For FortiProxy 7.4.x users: Upgrade to FortiProxy 7.4.4 or later
- 7. For FortiProxy 7.2.x users: Upgrade to FortiProxy 7.2.10 or later
- 8. For FortiProxy 7.0.x users: Upgrade to FortiProxy 7.0.17 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26006 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data