Remote Access Server FirmwareOperating system · Etictelecom

CVE-2024-26156

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-01-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
All versions of ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server (RAS) prior to 4.5.0 are vulnerable to reflected cross site scripting (XSS) attacks in the method parameter. The ETIC RAS web server uses dynamic pages that gets their input from the client side and reflects the input in its response to the client.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server versions prior to 4.5.0 contain a reflected XSS vulnerability in the 'method' parameter. The web server dynamically generates pages using client-supplied input without proper sanitization, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the victim's browser when the reflected content is displayed.

MitigationUpgrade ETIC RAS to version 4.5.0 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Until then, consider disabling the web interface or restricting network access to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Remote Access Server FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 4.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed firmware version
    Access the ETIC Telecom RAS administrative interface or system settings to view the current firmware version. If CLI access is available, use the vendor-specific command to retrieve the version information.
    Affected if The installed firmware version is prior to 4.5.0
  2. Confirm web server is enabled
    Verify that the RAS web interface is accessible by attempting to reach the HTTP/HTTPS endpoints typically used for remote access (such as the login page). Check network configuration to confirm the web service is listening.
    Affected if The web interface is enabled and reachable on the network
  3. Inspect 'method' parameter handling
    Send a test request to the RAS web server with a benign script payload in the 'method' parameter (for example, method=<script>alert(1)</script>). Examine the HTTP response to determine if the input is reflected back without encoding or sanitization.
    Affected if The 'method' parameter reflects unsanitized user input in the server response

Environment is affected if ETIC Telecom RAS firmware version is below 4.5.0 AND the web interface is enabled, allowing reflected XSS injection via the 'method' parameter.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.5.0 or later
Fixed in 4.5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade ETIC RAS to version 4.5.0 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Until then, consider disabling the web interface or restricting network access to trusted users only.

Recommended fix High confidence

ETIC Telecom RAS Firmware version 4.5.0

  1. Obtain the ETIC Telecom Remote Access Server firmware version 4.5.0 or later from the official ETIC Telecom vendor
  2. Access the RAS device administrative interface or console
  3. Navigate to the firmware update or system maintenance section
  4. Upload and apply the version 4.5.0 firmware file following vendor instructions
  5. Verify the firmware was successfully applied by checking the version in the system information
  6. Test that the XSS vulnerability in the method parameter is no longer exploitable

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Remote Access Server Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26156 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26156 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data