CVE-2024-27339
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKofax Power PDF PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Kofax Power PDF. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-22925.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Kofax Power PDF's PDF file parser. The flaw results from insufficient validation of user-supplied data during PDF parsing, allowing an attacker to write past the end of an allocated buffer and execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process via a malicious PDF file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.0.0.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Power PDF installationLocate Power PDF on the system via Add/Remove Programs on Windows or the Applications folder on macOS. Note the installation path for the next step.Affected if Power PDF is installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionOpen Power PDF and navigate to Help > About to view the version number, or right-click the executable file in the installation folder and check Properties > Details for the version.Affected if Version cannot be confirmed or is below 5.0.0.17
-
Compare to vulnerable version rangeIf a version number is obtained, compare it against the affected range: any version lower than 5.0.0.17 is considered vulnerable.Affected if Installed version is lower than 5.0.0.17
-
Evaluate PDF handling exposureAssess whether Power PDF is used to open PDF files from untrusted or external sources, as the vulnerability is triggered during PDF parsing when a user opens a malicious file.Affected if Users open untrusted PDF files using Power PDF
The environment is affected if Power PDF version is below 5.0.0.17 and users open PDF files with it, enabling the out-of-bounds write vulnerability to trigger during parsing.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.0.0.17
Apply vendor patch from Kofax when available. Until then, train users to avoid opening untrusted PDF files and consider using alternative PDF viewers for high-risk documents.
Power PDF version 5.0.0.17 or later
- 1. Verify current Power PDF version by opening the application and navigating to Help > About or checking in the application settings
- 2. Download Power PDF version 5.0.0.17 or later from the official Kofax website or your organization's software distribution point
- 3. Close all instances of Power PDF and any related processes
- 4. Run the installer with appropriate administrative privileges
- 5. Follow the on-screen installation prompts to complete the upgrade
- 6. After installation, verify the new version is correctly installed by checking Help > About
- 7. Test that PDF files open correctly and the application functions normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,592.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27339 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27339 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data