FortiaiopsApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2024-27782

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple insufficient session expiration weaknesses [CWE-613] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 may allow an attacker to re-use stolen old session tokens to perform unauthorized operations via crafted requests.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 contains a session expiration vulnerability where session tokens remain valid indefinitely after authentication. Attackers who obtain old or stolen session tokens can reuse them in crafted HTTP requests to perform unauthorized operations, bypassing the need for valid current credentials.

MitigationImplement proper session expiration by enforcing finite session lifetimes, invalidating sessions after logout or inactivity timeout, and ensuring old/stale session tokens are rejected at authentication.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortiaiopsApplication
Affected:= 2.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FortiAIOps version
    Access the FortiAIOps admin interface or CLI and locate the system version information. Typically found under System > Settings > About or via CLI command 'get system status'.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly FortiAIOps 2.0.0
  2. Locate session management configuration
    Navigate to System > Administration > Session or User > Session Settings in the FortiAIOps web interface. Look for session-related configuration panels.
    Affected if Session management settings are accessible and visible in the interface
  3. Verify session timeout configuration
    Inspect the session timeout or expiration setting within the session management panel. Record the configured timeout duration if present.
    Affected if No session timeout is configured, or timeout is set to an excessively long duration or disabled entirely
  4. Check session expiration policy
    Review any available session policy settings that control how long sessions remain valid after authentication, including idle timeout and absolute session lifetime.
    Affected if Sessions are configured to never expire or there is no enforced maximum session lifetime
  5. Test session token validity period
    If possible, authenticate to FortiAIOps, obtain a session token, wait beyond a reasonable period, then attempt to use the original token in an API request. Alternatively, review session logs for token validation behavior.
    Affected if Old session tokens continue to be accepted and remain valid after extended periods or after user logout
  6. Review authentication settings
    Examine the authentication configuration for any settings related to token validation, session renewal, or automatic logout. Look for options controlling token reuse or session invalidation.
    Affected if Authentication settings allow indefinite session token reuse without re-validation

A user is affected if they are running FortiAIOps version 2.0.0 and sessions do not have enforced expiration or invalidation of old tokens.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper session expiration by enforcing finite session lifetimes, invalidating sessions after logout or inactivity timeout, and ensuring old/stale session tokens are rejected at authentication.

Fix this in Fortiaiops Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $6,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27782 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27782 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data