FortiaiopsApplication · Fortinet
CVE-2024-27783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) weaknesses [CWE-352] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to perform arbitrary actions on behalf of an authenticated user via tricking the victim to execute malicious GET requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortinet FortiAIOps 2.0.0 contains multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities (CWE-352) where unauthenticated remote attackers can trick authenticated users into visiting malicious URLs, causing the victim's browser to automatically send GET requests that perform arbitrary actions on behalf of the user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
FortiaiopsApplication
= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiAIOps installation versionLocate the installed FortiAIOps version through the product's web UI, CLI interface, or API endpoint used for version reporting. Compare the version number to the affected range (2.0.0).Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.0.0
-
Confirm FortiAIOps is accessible over networkVerify the FortiAIOps web interface or API is reachable from network locations where potential victims would browse. Check if the application accepts authenticated sessions.Affected if FortiAIOps is exposed and accepts user authentication, creating the condition where authenticated users can be targeted
-
Verify CSRF protection statusInspect the application's state-changing endpoints (POST/PUT/DELETE operations) to determine whether anti-CSRF tokens are required and validated with each request. Examine the HTML forms and AJAX requests for the presence of CSRF token parameters.Affected if State-changing endpoints lack anti-CSRF token validation or do not validate Origin/Referer headers on requests
A user is affected if FortiAIOps version 2.0.0 is running and the application lacks anti-CSRF token protection on state-changing endpoints, allowing authenticated users to be exploited via malicious URL trickery.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing endpoints and validate Origin/Referer headers to prevent forged requests from malicious sites.
Fix this in Fortiaiops
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data