Micontact Center BusinessApplication · Mitel

CVE-2024-28069

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-03-16
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.0.0.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the legacy chat component of Mitel MiContact Center Business through 10.0.0.4 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to conduct an information disclosure attack due to improper configuration. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to access sensitive information and potentially conduct unauthorized actions within the vulnerable component.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Mitel MiContact Center Business versions through 10.0.0.4 contain an improperly configured legacy chat component that allows unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive information via the information disclosure vulnerability.

MitigationApply available vendor patches for MiContact Center Business to address the legacy chat component misconfiguration, or disable the legacy chat component if not required.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Micontact Center BusinessApplication
Affected:<= 10.0.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Mitel MiContact Center Business is installed
    Check installed programs list or look for MiContact Center Business installation directories on the system. Common paths may include C:\Program Files\Mitel\ or C:\Mitel\.
    Affected if The software is not found on the system, the user is not affected by this CVE.
  2. Determine the installed version of MiContact Center Business
    Check the application version through the software itself, Windows Programs and Features, or configuration files in the installation directory. Look for version information in about pages, logs, or registry entries.
    Affected if The installed version is 10.0.0.4 or lower, placing it within the affected range.
  3. Locate the legacy chat component
    Inspect the MiContact Center Business installation directory for legacy chat component files, configuration folders, or services. Look for directories or modules named 'chat', 'legacy', or similar legacy-related components.
    Affected if A legacy chat component exists in the installation, which may be the improperly configured component described in the CVE.
  4. Verify if the legacy chat component is enabled
    Check the configuration files or settings within MiContact Center Business to determine whether the legacy chat component is active, exposed, or accessible. Review web server configurations, application settings, or service configurations.
    Affected if The legacy chat component is enabled or exposed, creating the condition for unauthenticated information disclosure.

If MiContact Center Business version 10.0.0.4 or lower is installed AND the legacy chat component is enabled or present in the configuration, the environment is affected by this CVE.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.0.0.4
Interim mitigation

Apply available vendor patches for MiContact Center Business to address the legacy chat component misconfiguration, or disable the legacy chat component if not required.

Fix this in Micontact Center Business Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28069 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data