CVE-2024-29082
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control vulnerability affecting Vonets industrial wifi bridge relays and wifi bridge repeaters, software versions 3.3.23.6.9 and prior, enables an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass authentication and factory reset the device via unprotected goform endpoints.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper access control vulnerability in Vonets industrial wifi bridge relays and repeaters (software versions 3.3.23.6.9 and prior) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication and factory reset the device through unprotected goform endpoints. The CVSS 8.6 score reflects the critical severity of allowing complete device compromise without credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Vonets device modelLocate the device label or access the web management interface to determine the exact model (Var1200 H, Var1200 L, Var600 H, Vap11ac, Vap11g 500s, Vbg1200, Vap11s 5g, or Vap11s)Affected if The device is one of the listed Vonets models
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface or check system information pages to find the firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version is 3.3.23.6.9 or any version prior to it (lower numbers)
-
Verify remote management interface accessibilityDetermine if the device web interface or goform endpoints are accessible from external network segments by testing connectivity to the device IP from outside the local networkAffected if The device management interface is exposed to untrusted networks without firewall protection
You are affected if you have a Vonets Var1200, Var600, Vap11ac, Vap11g, Vbg1200, or Vap11s device running firmware version 3.3.23.6.9 or earlier that has its management interface reachable from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, isolate affected devices on restricted network segments, disable remote management interfaces if not required, and monitor for unauthorized factory reset attempts.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29082 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29082 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data