CVE-2024-37023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple OS command injection vulnerabilities affecting Vonets industrial wifi bridge relays and wifi bridge repeaters, software versions 3.3.23.6.9 and prior, enable an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands via various endpoint parameters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple OS command injection vulnerabilities in Vonets industrial wifi bridge devices (versions 3.3.23.6.9 and prior) allow authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands through various endpoint parameters. The vulnerabilities stem from insufficient input validation when handling user-supplied data in web interface endpoints, enabling command injection via shell metacharacters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9<= 3.3.23.6.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Vonets device modelAccess the device web interface or check device labeling to confirm the exact model (Var1200 H/L, Var600 H, Vap11ac, Vap11g 500s, Vbg1200, Vap11s 5g, or Vap11s)Affected if The device is any of these models and is in scope for this CVE
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to the status or system information page to view the firmware version. Compare against 3.3.23.6.9Affected if The firmware version is 3.3.23.6.9 or earlier (lower version numbers indicate the vulnerable release)
-
Verify the web management interface is enabledConfirm the device has its HTTP/HTTPS web interface accessible. This is typically on port 80 or 443. Check device network settings or attempt to access the interfaceAffected if The web management interface is enabled and accessible - this is the attack vector for command injection
-
Determine if remote management is exposedCheck the device network configuration to see if the web interface is bound to WAN or external network interfaces, or use network scanning to detect the device management port from outside your LANAffected if The web interface is exposed to untrusted networks (not just trusted LAN segments)
Your environment is affected if you have any Vonets device (Var1200, Var600, Vap11ac, Vap11g 500s, Vbg1200, Vap11s 5g, or Vap11s) running firmware version 3.3.23.6.9 or earlier with the web management interface enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a patched firmware version from Vonets; if unavailable, restrict network access to the device management interface and review for suspicious administrative accounts or unexpected processes.
Latest available Vonets firmware version beyond 3.3.23.6.9 (contact Vonets vendor for specific fixed release)
- 1. Identify the specific Vonets device model from the affected product list (Var1200 H, Var1200 L, Var600 H, Vap11ac, Vap11g 500s, Vbg1200, Vap11s 5g, or Vap11s)
- 2. Access the device management interface or Vonets support website
- 3. Check for available firmware updates beyond version 3.3.23.6.9
- 4. Download the latest firmware version available from the official Vonets vendor
- 5. Follow the vendor's documented firmware upgrade procedure to apply the update
- 6. After upgrading, verify the device is functioning correctly and the firmware version has been updated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,568.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-37023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-37023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data