CVE-2024-29231
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper validation of array index vulnerability in UserPrivilege.Enum webapi component in Synology Surveillance Station before 9.2.0-9289 and 9.2.0-11289 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information and conduct limited denial-of-service attacks via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper array index validation in the UserPrivilege.Enum webapi component of Synology Surveillance Station allows authenticated remote users to access non-sensitive information and cause limited denial-of-service through unspecified vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.2.0-9289< 9.2.0-11289CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Synology Surveillance Station is installedCheck if the package exists on your Synology DSM system. On the NAS, run: cat /var/packages/SurveillanceStation/info.json 2>/dev/null || echo 'Not installed'Affected if The package is not installed or the info.json file does not exist
-
Determine installed Surveillance Station versionFrom the output of the previous command, locate the 'version' or 'version' field in the info.json file. Alternatively, open DSM > Package Center > Surveillance Station and note the displayed version number.Affected if The version displayed is lower than 9.2.0-9289 or 9.2.0-11289
-
Confirm webapi component is accessibleVerify the Surveillance Station web interface is accessible at https://[your-synology-ip]:5001/webapi/ or through the Surveillance Station client. The vulnerability exists in the UserPrivilege.Enum webapi endpoint.Affected if The webapi interface is reachable and the UserPrivilege.Enum endpoint responds to authenticated requests
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if your installed version is less than 9.2.0-9289 (for builds prior to 9289) or less than 9.2.0-11289 (for builds prior to 11289). Both thresholds indicate vulnerability.Affected if Your installed version is earlier than both 9.2.0-9289 and 9.2.0-11289
You are affected if Synology Surveillance Station is installed and the installed version is below 9.2.0-9289 or below 9.2.0-11289.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.2.0-92899.2.0-11289
Upgrade Synology Surveillance Station to version 9.2.0-9289 or 9.2.0-11289 or later to address the improper array index validation vulnerability.
Surveillance Station 9.2.0-9289 or 9.2.0-11289 (or later)
- 1. Open Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) and log in with administrator privileges
- 2. Navigate to Package Center or directly open Surveillance Station
- 3. Check the current installed version of Surveillance Station in the application settings
- 4. If the installed version is below 9.2.0-9289 (or 9.2.0-11289 depending on your build), initiate an update
- 5. In Surveillance Station, go to Settings > General > System > Check for Updates, or use the Synology Package Center to update Surveillance Station
- 6. Apply the update and restart Surveillance Station services if prompted
- 7. Verify the version has been updated to 9.2.0-9289 or higher (or 9.2.0-11289 or higher for the applicable build)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29231 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29231 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data