CVE-2024-31469
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the underlying Central Communications service that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's Access Point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Aruba's Central Communications service allowing unauthenticated remote code execution via specially crafted packets to PAPI UDP port 8211 (the Access Point management protocol). Successful exploitation grants arbitrary code execution as a privileged user on the underlying OS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.3.0.0, < 10.4.1.1>= 10.5.0.0, < 10.5.1.1>= 6.4.0.0, < 8.6.0.24>= 8.7.0.0, < 8.10.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed ArubaOS or InstantOS versionRun 'show version' on the Aruba controller or access point CLI, or check the web UI dashboard for the firmware versionAffected if The version falls within >= 10.3.0.0 and < 10.4.1.1, OR >= 10.5.0.0 and < 10.4.1.1, OR >= 6.4.0.0 and < 8.6.0.24, OR >= 8.7.0.0 and < 8.10.0.11
-
Verify if UDP port 8211 is listening or exposedRun 'show ip interface' to list all listening services, or use 'netstat -anu | grep 8211' or 'ss -uan | grep 8211' to check if UDP port 8211 is bound to an interfaceAffected if UDP port 8211 is open and listening on any interface accessible from untrusted networks
-
Confirm the PAPI service statusCheck if the PAPI (Access Point Management Protocol) service is enabled by running 'show process' or reviewing the service configuration in the Aruba Central dashboard or local controller CLIAffected if The PAPI service is running and bound to a network interface reachable from outside the trusted network
You are affected if your device runs a vulnerable ArubaOS or InstantOS version AND has UDP port 8211 exposed to untrusted networks with the PAPI service enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.0.248.10.0.1110.4.1.1
Apply vendor-supplied patches immediately. Until patched, restrict network access to UDP port 8211 using firewalls or network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks.
ArubaOS 10.4.1.1+ (for 10.3.x branch) or 10.5.1.1+ (for 10.5.x branch); InstantOS 8.6.0.24+ (for 6.4.x branch) or 8.10.0.11+ (for 8.7.x branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed ArubaOS or InstantOS version by accessing the device CLI or web interface
- 2. For ArubaOS 10.3.x versions: Upgrade to version 10.4.1.1 or later
- 3. For ArubaOS 10.5.x versions: Upgrade to version 10.5.1.1 or later
- 4. For InstantOS 6.4.x versions: Upgrade to version 8.6.0.24 or later
- 5. For InstantOS 8.7.x versions: Upgrade to version 8.10.0.11 or later
- 6. Download the appropriate firmware from the official Aruba Networks support portal (support.arubanetworks.com)
- 7. Upload the firmware through the device management interface or via console/TFTP
- 8. Verify the upgrade completes successfully and the device is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31469 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31469 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data