CVE-2024-31472
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere are command injection vulnerabilities in the underlying Soft AP Daemon service that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's Access Point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerabilities in Aruba's Soft AP Daemon service allow unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user by sending specially crafted packets to the PAPI UDP port 8211. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation allowing injection of OS commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.3.0.0, < 10.4.1.1>= 10.5.0.0, < 10.5.1.1>= 6.4.0.0, < 8.6.0.24>= 8.7.0.0, < 8.10.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionRun 'show version' on the Aruba device CLI or check system information for HP InstantOSAffected if Version falls within the affected ranges: ArubaOS >= 10.3.0.0 to < 10.4.1.1 or >= 10.5.0.0 to < 10.5.1.1; HP InstantOS >= 6.4.0.0 to < 8.6.0.24 or >= 8.7.0.0 to < 8.10.0.11
-
Verify Soft AP Daemon is runningExecute 'show process' or 'show process papimain' in the device CLI to check if the Soft AP Daemon (papimain) process is activeAffected if The Soft AP Daemon process is running on the device
-
Confirm UDP port 8211 is listeningRun 'show port 8211' or use 'netstat -an | grep 8211' to verify UDP port 8211 is open and listeningAffected if UDP port 8211 is in LISTEN or OPEN state on the device
-
Assess network exposure of port 8211Review ACLs, firewall rules, and interface configurations to determine if UDP port 8211 is reachable from untrusted network segmentsAffected if Port 8211 is exposed to untrusted or external networks without proper filtering
The environment is affected if the device runs an affected version of ArubaOS or HP InstantOS, the Soft AP Daemon is active, and UDP port 8211 is accessible, particularly from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.0.248.10.0.1110.4.1.1
Apply vendor-provided patches or firmware updates for the Soft AP Daemon; as an interim measure, restrict network access to UDP port 8211 from untrusted sources.
ArubaOS 10.4.1.1 or 10.5.1.1 (depending on current branch); InstantOS 8.6.0.24 or 8.10.0.11 (depending on current branch)
- Identify the exact ArubaOS or InstantOS version currently running using 'show version' or the WebUI
- For ArubaOS: If running >= 10.3.0.0 and < 10.4.1.1, upgrade to version 10.4.1.1 or later
- For ArubaOS: If running >= 10.5.0.0 and < 10.5.1.1, upgrade to version 10.5.1.1 or later
- For InstantOS: If running >= 6.4.0.0 and < 8.6.0.24, upgrade to version 8.6.0.24 or later
- For InstantOS: If running >= 8.7.0.0 and < 8.10.0.11, upgrade to version 8.10.0.11 or later
- Download the appropriate upgrade image from the Aruba support portal (support.hpe.com or www.arubanetworks.com)
- Follow Aruba's standard upgrade procedure - typically via WebUI (Maintenance > Software > Upload) or CLI ('upgrade-software'), ensuring to back up configuration first
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the device is running the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31472 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31472 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data