CVE-2024-32114
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Apache ActiveMQ 6.x, the default configuration doesn't secure the API web context (where the Jolokia JMX REST API and the Message REST API are located). It means that anyone can use these layers without any required authentication. Potentially, anyone can interact with the broker (using Jolokia JMX REST API) and/or produce/consume messages or purge/delete destinations (using the Message REST API). To mitigate, users can update the default conf/jetty.xml configuration file to add authentication requirement: <bean id="securityConstraintMapping" class="org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintMapping"> <property name="constraint" ref="securityConstraint" /> <property name="pathSpec" value="/" /> </bean> Or we encourage users to upgrade to Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.2 where the default configuration has been updated with authentication by default.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache ActiveMQ 6.x ships with an unsecured API web context by default, exposing the Jolokia JMX REST API and Message REST API without authentication. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to interact with the broker, produce/consume messages, and manage destinations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache ActiveMQ versionLocate the ActiveMQ installation directory and check the version. In the installation root, look for a RELEASE-NOTES file or run: ls -la and check for version markers. Alternatively, check if there's a version file in the lib directory or use any package manager that installed ActiveMQ.Affected if The installed version is >= 6.0.0 and < 6.1.2
-
Verify web connector is enabledCheck if the web server is running by examining conf/jetty.xml or conf/jetty-realm.properties. Look for connector configurations that enable HTTP/HTTPS access on ports like 8161 (default web console port).Affected if The web connector is active and accessible on a network port
-
Inspect jetty.xml for security constraintsExamine the conf/jetty.xml file and search for security-constraint or constraint mappings. Specifically look for sections that define URL patterns for /api/jolokia or /api/message and whether they have associated security constraint definitions.Affected if No security-constraint mappings are defined for the /api/* endpoints, or none exist at all
-
Test unauthenticated API accessAttempt to access the Jolokia endpoint at http://localhost:8161/api/jolokia or the Message REST API at http://localhost:8161/api/message without providing any credentials. Use curl or similar: curl -I http://localhost:8161/api/jolokiaAffected if The endpoints respond with HTTP 200 or 401 (meaning they are reachable) rather than requiring authentication upfront; a successful response without credentials indicates the vulnerability is present
-
Check for disabled anonymous access in jetty.xmlIn conf/jetty.xml, look for security-related configuration sections. Specifically check if ConstraintSecurityHandler or LoginAuthenticator is configured with any form of authentication enforcement. Look for missing <auth-method> or <constraint> definitions.Affected if No authentication method is explicitly configured for the API web context, leaving it open by default
A user is affected if they are running Apache ActiveMQ version 6.0.0 through 6.1.1 with the web console API accessible without authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.1.2
Upgrade to Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.2 or later which includes authentication by default, or manually update conf/jetty.xml to add security constraint mappings that enforce authentication on the API endpoints.
Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.2
- Download Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.2 from the official Apache ActiveMQ distribution (https://activemq.apache.org/download)
- Stop the currently running ActiveMQ 6.x instance
- Backup the existing ActiveMQ installation directory including conf/ and data/ directories
- Extract or install Apache ActiveMQ 6.1.2 to the target location
- Copy the backed-up configuration files (especially conf/jetty.xml and any customized configs) to the new installation
- Start the ActiveMQ 6.1.2 service
- Verify that authentication is now required for the Jolokia JMX REST API and Message REST API endpoints
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32114 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32114 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data