CVE-2024-34033
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDelta Electronics DIAEnergie has insufficient input validation which makes it possible to perform a path traversal attack and write outside of the intended directory. If a file name is specified that already exists on the file system, then the original file will be overwritten.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDelta Electronics DIAEnergie contains a path traversal vulnerability due to insufficient input validation on file path parameters. An attacker can manipulate file paths using '../' sequences to write files outside the intended directory, potentially overwriting system files or deploying malicious payloads.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.10.00.005CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm DIAEnergie installationLocate the Delta Electronics DIAEnergie application on the system. Common installation paths may include C:\Program Files\Delta Electronics\DIAEnergie or similar. Check for the presence of DIAEnergie executable files or services.Affected if The software is installed and is version 1.10.00.005
-
Verify installed versionAccess the application's About page, help menu, or check the executable file properties (right-click on the main .exe file, select Properties, view Version tab). Alternatively, check the installation directory for version information in configuration or manifest files.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.10.00.005
-
Identify exposed web interfacesCheck for running web services associated with DIAEnergie. Look for IIS or Apache services hosting the application. Examine Windows Services or netstat output for ports typically used by the application (commonly port 80, 443, or custom ports).Affected if The DIAEnergie web interface is accessible over the network and the version is 1.10.00.005
-
Locate file operation featuresExamine the web application for file upload, file write, export, backup, or configuration import functionalities. These are typically found in administrative or data management sections of the web interface.Affected if File write or upload functionality exists and the application version is 1.10.00.005
The environment is affected if Delta Electronics DIAEnergie version 1.10.00.005 is installed and exposes file operation features through its web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation with allow-list filtering for permitted directories, normalize and resolve paths server-side before use, and enforce file write operations to remain within a controlled sandbox directory.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34033 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data