Raid Web ConsoleApplication · Intel

CVE-2024-34543

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper access control in Intel(R) RAID Web Console software for all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Intel RAID Web Console software has an improper access control vulnerability allowing authenticated users to escalate their privileges via local access. An attacker with valid credentials and local system access can elevate their privileges beyond what their account should permit.

MitigationApply the latest Intel RAID Web Console software update or patch from Intel to remediate the access control flaw. Verify that user privilege assignments align with least-privilege principles.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Raid Web ConsoleApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Intel RAID Web Console is installed
    Check installed programs or running services for Intel RAID Web Console (often called 'RAID Web Console' or 'Intel RWC'). On Windows, check Programs and Features or services.msc. On Linux, check package manager or running processes.
    Affected if Intel RAID Web Console software is present on the system
  2. Identify local user accounts with access
    Review user accounts configured for Intel RAID Web Console access. Check the software's user management interface, configuration files, or system user permissions related to the RWC service.
    Affected if Multiple local user accounts exist with authenticated access to the software
  3. Verify current privilege assignments
    Examine what privileges each authenticated user account has been assigned within Intel RAID Web Console. Compare the assigned privileges against the expected least-privilege configuration.
    Affected if Any standard or low-privilege user account has been granted elevated or administrative privileges beyond what their role should require
  4. Test local privilege boundaries
    Using a non-administrator local account with valid Intel RAID Web Console credentials, attempt to access administrative functions, configuration changes, or system-level operations that should be restricted to higher-privilege users.
    Affected if A standard user can perform actions reserved for administrator or elevated roles

If Intel RAID Web Console is installed and local users with standard privileges can access elevated administrative functions or configurations beyond their intended role, the environment is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the latest Intel RAID Web Console software update or patch from Intel to remediate the access control flaw. Verify that user privilege assignments align with least-privilege principles.

Fix this in Raid Web Console Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-34543 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-34543 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data