CVE-2024-36247
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper access control in Intel(R) RAID Web Console all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIntel RAID Web Console contains an improper access control vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to trigger denial of service conditions through adjacent network access. The CVSS 5.7 score indicates a medium-severity issue affecting all versions of the software, where the combination of authentication requirement and adjacent attack vector enables a DoS impact on the system's availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Intel RAID Web Console is installedCheck Windows installed programs list (Control Panel > Programs and Features) or query the registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for entries containing 'Intel RAID Web Console' or 'RWC'Affected if The software is present on the system
-
Verify the RAID Web Console service is runningOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Intel(R) RAID Web Console' or check via command: sc query type= service state= all | findstr /i 'raid.*web.*console'Affected if The service is in a Running state
-
Confirm network exposure of the management interfaceCheck for open ports associated with the web console (common ports: 443, 8443, 8000) by running 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' and reviewing which local IP addresses are bound (0.0.0.0 = externally accessible, 127.0.0.1 = local only)Affected if The service is listening on 0.0.0.0 or an external interface, making it accessible from the adjacent network
-
Verify authentication is enabled for the web consoleAccess the web console login page (https://localhost:port or the detected IP:port) and confirm a login prompt appears, or check configuration files in the installation directory for authentication settingsAffected if The interface requires authentication (which is the condition for this authenticated DoS vulnerability to apply)
If Intel RAID Web Console is installed, running, network-accessible, and authentication is required, the environment is affected by this CVE and adjacent network attackers who obtain valid credentials could cause denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the latest Intel RAID Web Console security patch when available. Until then, restrict adjacent network access through network segmentation and implement monitoring for DoS indicators against the management interface.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36247 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36247 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data