CVE-2024-36474
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn integer overflow vulnerability exists in the Compound Document Binary File format parser of the GNOME Project G Structured File Library (libgsf) version v1.14.52. A specially crafted file can result in an integer overflow when processing the directory from the file that allows for an out-of-bounds index to be used when reading and writing to an array. This can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA high-severity integer overflow vulnerability exists in libgsf v1.14.52's Compound Document Binary File (OLE/CFBF) parser. When processing maliciously crafted directory structures, an integer overflow allows an out-of-bounds array index to be used, leading to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.14.52CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if libgsf is installedRun 'pkg-config --modversion libgsf' on Linux, or check installed packages via 'rpm -q libgsf' (RHEL/Fedora) or 'dpkg -l libgsf' (Debian/Ubuntu)Affected if libgsf is present on the system
-
Verify the installed version is 1.14.52Compare the version output from the previous step to the affected version 1.14.52Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.14.52
-
Identify applications using libgsfSearch for binaries linked against libgsf using 'ldd' or check package dependencies for gnumeric, abiword, or other office applications that depend on libgsfAffected if Applications that handle Compound Document files (legacy .doc, .xls, .ppt) are in use
-
Determine if OLE/CFBF file processing is enabledCheck if users have the capability to open or process legacy Office files through applications that depend on libgsf; inspect file association configurationsAffected if Applications using libgsf can open or parse OLE/CFBF-based legacy Office documents
You are affected if libgsf version 1.14.52 is installed AND applications using libgsf are used to process legacy Compound Document files (.doc, .xls, .ppt).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate libgsf to the latest patched version. Until then, avoid opening untrusted or unknown Compound Document files (.doc, .xls, .ppt legacy formats) with applications using libgsf.
libgsf >= 1.14.53
- 1. Identify all systems and applications that depend on libgsf version 1.14.52
- 2. Upgrade libgsf to the latest stable version (1.14.53 or later) using your distribution's package manager or by compiling from source
- 3. For Debian/Ubuntu: apt-get update && apt-get install libgsf-1-114 (or apt-get upgrade libgsf)
- 4. For RHEL/CentOS: yum update libgsf
- 5. For macOS with Homebrew: brew upgrade libgsf
- 6. Verify the installed version matches a fixed release: gsflib --version or rpm -q libgsf
- 7. Recompile any applications that link against libgsf to ensure they use the updated library
- 8. Test that applications using libgsf (such as LibreOffice, Gnumeric) function correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36474 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data