CVE-2024-36522
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe default configuration of XSLTResourceStream.java is vulnerable to remote code execution via XSLT injection when processing input from an untrusted source without validation. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 10.1.0, 9.18.0 or 8.16.0, which fix this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXSLTResourceStream.java has a default configuration vulnerable to remote code execution through XSLT injection. The vulnerability occurs when processing input from untrusted sources without proper validation, allowing attackers to inject malicious XSLT code that can lead to RCE.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.16.0>= 9.0.0, < 9.18.0= 10.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Wicket versionLocate the wicket-core.jar file or check your project's dependency management (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle) for the org.apache.wicket:wicket-core versionAffected if The installed version is 8.0.0 through 8.15.x, 9.0.0 through 9.17.x, or exactly 10.0.0
-
Check for XSLTResourceStream usageSearch your codebase for imports or references to org.apache.wicket.resource.XSLTResourceStream or XSLTResourceStreamAffected if Your application code imports or uses XSLTResourceStream to process XML transformations
-
Determine if untrusted XSLT input is processedReview code that uses XSLTResourceStream or similar XSLT processors - trace the source of XML/XSLT input (request parameters, uploaded files, external URLs)Affected if The application accepts XML or XSLT content from untrusted sources (user HTTP requests, uploaded files, external endpoints) and passes it to XSLT processing without validation
-
Inspect resource loading configurationExamine how resource loaders are configured in your Wicket application - check WEB-INF/web.xml, application initialization code, or any ResourceStreamUrlData implementationsAffected if The application configures custom resource streams that load XSLT content from user-controllable locations
You are affected if your Apache Wicket version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND your application uses XSLTResourceStream or similar XSLT processing with input from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.16.09.18.0
Upgrade to versions 10.1.0, 9.18.0, or 8.16.0 which contain the fix for this vulnerability. Additionally, implement input validation for any XSLT processing from untrusted sources.
8.16.0 (if on 8.x), 9.18.0 (if on 9.x), or 10.1.0 (if on 10.x)
- Identify the current Apache Wicket version in use by checking the project's dependency files (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle, or equivalent)
- Determine which major version line is in use (8.x, 9.x, or 10.x)
- For projects using Wicket 8.x: upgrade to version 8.16.0 or later
- For projects using Wicket 9.x: upgrade to version 9.18.0 or later
- For projects using Wicket 10.x: upgrade to version 10.1.0 or later
- Update the version in the dependency management file and rebuild the project
- Verify the upgrade by running existing tests to ensure compatibility
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36522 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36522 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data