CVE-2024-36997
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.2.2, 9.1.5, and 9.0.10 and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 9.1.2312, an admin user could store and execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the browser context of another Splunk user through the conf-web/settings REST endpoint. This could potentially cause a persistent cross-site scripting (XSS) exploit.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA persistent XSS vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise (versions below 9.2.2, 9.1.5, and 9.0.10) and Splunk Cloud Platform (below 9.1.2312) allows an authenticated admin user to inject arbitrary JavaScript through the conf-web/settings REST endpoint. The malicious payload is stored and executes in the browser context of other Splunk users who access the affected content, enabling session hijacking, data theft, or further propagation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.10>= 9.1.0, < 9.1.5>= 9.2.0, < 9.2.2>= 9.1.2312, < 9.1.2312.100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Splunk versionRun the command: splunk --version or access the About page in Splunk Web (Settings > About) to view the exact version numberAffected if The version is 9.0.0 to 9.0.9, 9.1.0 to 9.1.4, 9.2.0 to 9.2.1, or for Cloud Platform versions below 9.1.2312.100
-
Review conf-web/settings endpoint access logsSearch Splunk internal logs (index=_internal) for POST requests to services/conf-web/settings, looking for entries with unusual or suspicious values in the request bodyAffected if There are POST requests to conf-web/settings containing JavaScript tags, script src attributes, or encoded suspicious payloads that were successfully stored
-
Inspect web configuration for stored XSS payloadsMake a GET request to services/conf-web/settings or examine the contents of the web.conf file in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/ for unexpected script tags or event handlersAffected if The configuration contains JavaScript code, script tags, img onerror attributes, or other XSS vectors in fields that should contain only plain text
-
Check for unauthorized admin account modificationsReview the authentication and authorization logs (index=_internal source=*authentication*) for any admin account changes or privilege escalations around the time of the conf-web/settings modificationAffected if An authenticated admin user injected a malicious payload and that payload remains stored in the configuration
You are affected if your Splunk version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND there is evidence of a malicious payload stored in the conf-web/settings configuration endpoint.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.109.1.59.1.2312.100
Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to version 9.2.2, 9.1.5, or 9.0.10 (or higher), or upgrade Splunk Cloud Platform to version 9.1.2312 or later. Alternatively, restrict admin privileges and monitor the conf-web/settings endpoint for suspicious activity until patching is completed.
Splunk Enterprise: 9.2.2 (or 9.1.5 or 9.0.10 minimum per your branch); Splunk Cloud Platform: 9.1.2312.100
- Identify your current Splunk Enterprise version by navigating to About > Version or running: splunk version
- For Splunk Enterprise 9.0.x: Upgrade to version 9.0.10 or later
- For Splunk Enterprise 9.1.x: Upgrade to version 9.1.5 or later
- For Splunk Enterprise 9.2.x: Upgrade to version 9.2.2 or later
- For Splunk Cloud Platform: Contact Splunk Support to request upgrade to 9.1.2312.100 or later
- After upgrade, verify the conf-web/settings endpoint no longer accepts unsanitized input
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-36997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-36997 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data