CVE-2024-39746
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by the failure to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services versions 6.0-6.3 fail to properly enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), a web security policy mechanism that forces browsers to use HTTPS connections. Without HSTS enabled, attackers performing man-in-the-middle attacks can downgrade or intercept encrypted communications to obtain sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.1.0= 6.2.0= 6.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services versionCheck the product version through the IBM administration console, installation directory, or by querying the web services endpoint. Common locations include /opt/IBM/cdirect or the installation manifest file.Affected if The installed version is 6.0, 6.1.0, 6.2.0, or 6.3.0.
-
Locate the web server configuration fileIdentify the web server running IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services (typically IBM HTTP Server or WebSphere). Find the httpd.conf or plugin-cfg.xml configuration file.Affected if The configuration file exists but does not contain Strict-Transport-Security header directives.
-
Verify HSTS header configuration in web serverSearch the web server configuration for 'Strict-Transport-Security' or 'HSTS' directives. In Apache-style configs, look for 'Header always set Strict-Transport-Security'. In IHS, check the httpd.conf and plugin-cfg.xml.Affected if No HSTS header directive is configured or the directive is commented out.
-
Test actual HTTP response for HSTS headerSend an HTTPS request to the Connect:Direct Web Services endpoint using a browser's developer tools, curl -I https://<host>:<port>/, or a similar tool. Inspect the response headers for 'Strict-Transport-Security'.Affected if The Strict-Transport-Security header is missing from HTTPS responses.
-
Confirm HSTS preload readiness if applicableCheck if the HSTS header includes the 'preload' directive and verify the max-age value is at least 31536000 seconds (1 year).Affected if HSTS header is present but max-age is less than 31536000 or preload directive is missing.
A user is affected if they are running IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services version 6.0-6.3 and the web server is not configured to send the Strict-Transport-Security header in HTTPS responses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedEnable HSTS on the IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services server by configuring the web server to include the Strict-Transport-Security header in all HTTP responses.
- 1. Identify the web server hosting IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services (e.g., IBM HTTP Server, WebSphere Application Server)
- 2. Access the web server configuration file (httpd.conf for IBM HTTP Server or web.xml/plugin-cfg.xml for WebSphere)
- 3. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) by adding the HSTS header directive
- 4. For IBM HTTP Server, add: Header always set Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains"
- 5. For WebSphere, enable HSTS through the IBM HTTP Server front-end or WebSphere configuration
- 6. Set an appropriate max-age value (recommended: 31536000 seconds = 1 year)
- 7. Consider adding the preload directive if the domain is eligible for the HSTS preload list
- 8. Test the configuration to verify the Strict-Transport-Security header is returned in responses
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-39746 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-39746 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data