CVE-2024-45651
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services 6.1.0, 6.2.0, and 6.3.0 does not invalidate session after a browser closure which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services versions 6.1.0 through 6.3.0 fail to invalidate user sessions upon browser closure. This session management flaw allows a previously authenticated user's session to remain active, potentially enabling that user or an attacker with access to the same browser to impersonate other legitimate users on the system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.1.0, < 6.1.0.28>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.0.27>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.0.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services installationLocate the IBM Sterling Connect:Direct installation directory and look for version information in product files, manifest, or about/version utilities. Common locations include /opt/ibm/ConnectDirect or installation-specific paths.Affected if The product is installed and the Web Services component is present
-
Determine the installed version of Sterling Connect:Direct Web ServicesUse the product's built-in version command, check version.info files, or access the Web Services interface and inspect the version displayed in the UI or API response.Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 6.1.0 through 6.1.0.27, 6.2.0 through 6.2.0.26, or 6.3.0 through 6.3.0.12
-
Verify the Web Services component is enabledAccess the Web Services endpoint (typically https://hostname:8443/cdws or similar) to confirm the web interface is active and reachable.Affected if The Web Services interface is accessible and the version is within the affected ranges listed above
-
Inspect session configuration behaviorLog into the Web Services interface, then close the browser tab without logging out. Reopen the browser and navigate to the Web Services URL to see if the previous session remains active without re-authentication.Affected if The session persists after browser closure without requiring re-authentication, confirming the session invalidation flaw is present
A user is affected if IBM Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services is installed with a version matching 6.1.0.x where x<28, 6.2.0.x where x<27, or 6.3.0.x where x<13, and the Web Services interface exhibits session persistence after browser closure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.1.0.286.2.0.276.3.0.13
Implement proper session invalidation on browser close or implement session token expiration upon logout. Additionally, consider implementing server-side session timeouts and binding sessions to additional client identifiers to reduce session hijacking risk.
6.1.0.28 (for 6.1.x), 6.2.0.27 (for 6.2.x), or 6.3.0.13 (for 6.3.x)
- Identify the currently deployed version of Sterling Connect:Direct Web Services
- Determine which version branch is in use (6.1.x, 6.2.x, or 6.3.x)
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Back up the current configuration and all user data
- For version 6.1.x: Upgrade to version 6.1.0.28 or later
- For version 6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.0.27 or later
- For version 6.3.x: Upgrade to version 6.3.0.13 or later
- Apply the upgrade following IBM installation documentation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-45651 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-45651 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data