Ipc Diagnostics PackageApplication · Beckhoff

CVE-2024-41174

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.1.1.0 / 14.1.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The IPC-Diagnostics package in TwinCAT/BSD is susceptible to improper input neutralization by a low-privileged local attacker.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The IPC-Diagnostics package in Beckhoff's TwinCAT/BSD operating system contains an improper input neutralization vulnerability. A low-privileged local attacker can exploit insufficient input validation to potentially escalate privileges or inject malicious input, as indicated by the CVSS 7.3 HIGH severity rating.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches for TwinCAT/BSD when available. As an interim measure, restrict local access to trusted personnel only and monitor IPC-Diagnostics package usage for anomalous behavior.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ipc Diagnostics PackageApplication
Affected:< 2.1.1.0
Twincat\/bsdOperating system
Affected:< 14.1.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check IPC-Diagnostics package version
    Access the Beckhoff TwinCAT/BSD system and run the package manager or system information command to list installed packages and their versions. Look for 'Ipc Diagnostics Package' or similar diagnostic package entries.
    Affected if The installed IPC-Diagnostics package version is lower than 2.1.1.0
  2. Check TwinCAT/BSD operating system version
    On the TwinCAT/BSD system, run 'uname -a' or check system information to identify the OS version. Look for TwinCAT/BSD version information.
    Affected if The TwinCAT/BSD version is lower than 14.1.2.0
  3. Verify IPC-Diagnostics service status
    Check if the IPC-Diagnostics service or daemon is running on the system. This may involve checking system services, running processes, or listening network ports related to diagnostics functionality.
    Affected if The IPC-Diagnostics service is active and accessible to low-privileged users
  4. Check IPC-Diagnostics configuration and permissions
    Examine the configuration files and permission settings for the IPC-Diagnostics package. Look for any configuration that controls input validation, user access controls, or privilege levels.
    Affected if Input validation settings are weak or low-privileged users have access to diagnostic input interfaces

A system is affected if it runs TwinCAT/BSD with an IPC-Diagnostics package version below 2.1.1.0 or TwinCAT/BSD version below 14.1.2.0, and the IPC-Diagnostics feature is enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.1.1.0 / 14.1.2.0 or later
Fixed in 2.1.1.014.1.2.0
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches for TwinCAT/BSD when available. As an interim measure, restrict local access to trusted personnel only and monitor IPC-Diagnostics package usage for anomalous behavior.

Recommended fix High confidence

IPC Diagnostics Package 2.1.1.0 or TwinCAT/BSD 14.1.2.0

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed version of the IPC Diagnostics Package or TwinCAT/BSD on the affected system
  2. 2. If using IPC Diagnostics Package, upgrade to version 2.1.1.0 or later
  3. 3. If using TwinCAT/BSD, upgrade to version 14.1.2.0 or later
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version number
  5. 5. Test the IPC Diagnostics functionality to confirm the XSS vulnerability has been remediated

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ipc Diagnostics Package Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41174 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41174 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data