Ipc Diagnostics PackageApplication · Beckhoff

CVE-2024-41175

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-08-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.0.0.1 / 14.1.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The IPC-Diagnostics package included in TwinCAT/BSD is vulnerable to a local denial-of-service attack by a low privileged attacker.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The IPC-Diagnostics package in TwinCAT/BSD contains a local denial-of-service vulnerability that allows a low-privileged attacker to crash or disable the diagnostic service, likely through improper resource handling or service configuration.

MitigationRestrict local access to systems running TwinCAT/BSD to authorized administrators only, and contact Beckhoff for a patch or specific hardening guidance for the IPC-Diagnostics package.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ipc Diagnostics PackageApplication
Affected:< 2.0.0.1
Twincat\/bsdOperating system
Affected:< 14.1.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if IPC-Diagnostics package is installed
    On the TwinCAT/BSD system, run 'pkg info' or check the installed packages list for 'ipc-diagnostics' or similar diagnostic package names
    Affected if The IPC-Diagnostics package is installed and its version is below 2.0.0.1
  2. Determine IPC-Diagnostics package version
    Run 'pkg info ipc-diagnostics' or 'pkg version' to retrieve the exact version number of the installed diagnostic package
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.0.0.1
  3. Check TwinCAT/BSD operating system version
    Run 'uname -a' or check system information to identify the TwinCAT/BSD version
    Affected if The TwinCAT/BSD version is lower than 14.1.2.0
  4. Verify if diagnostic service is running
    Check running services using 'ps aux' or 'systemctl status' for any diagnostic-related processes
    Affected if The IPC-Diagnostics service is currently running on the system
  5. Confirm service is accessible to low-privileged users
    Check file permissions on diagnostic service binaries and configuration files, and verify which local users have access to interact with the service
    Affected if Non-administrative users have read or execute access to the diagnostic service components

You are affected if the IPC-Diagnostics package version is below 2.0.0.1 OR TwinCAT/BSD version is below 14.1.2.0, and the diagnostic service is accessible to low-privileged local users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.0.0.1 / 14.1.2.0 or later
Fixed in 2.0.0.114.1.2.0
Interim mitigation

Restrict local access to systems running TwinCAT/BSD to authorized administrators only, and contact Beckhoff for a patch or specific hardening guidance for the IPC-Diagnostics package.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Ipc Diagnostics Package >= 2.0.0.1 or TwinCAT/BSD >= 14.1.2.0

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed version of the IPC Diagnostics Package and TwinCAT/BSD on the affected system
  2. 2. For IPC Diagnostics Package: Upgrade to version 2.0.0.1 or later
  3. 3. For TwinCAT/BSD: Upgrade to version 14.1.2.0 or later
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version numbers
  5. 5. Test that the IPC Diagnostics functionality operates normally after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ipc Diagnostics Package Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,800
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41175 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41175 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data