CVE-2024-41684
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability exists in SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT Router due to missing secure flag for the session cookies associated with the router's web management interface. An attacker with remote access could exploit this by intercepting transmission within an HTTP session on the vulnerable system. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to capture cookies and compromise the targeted system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT Router's web management interface does not set the Secure flag on session cookies, causing them to be transmitted over unencrypted HTTP connections. An attacker with network interception capability can capture these cookies and hijack authenticated sessions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.02-231102CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm router modelAccess the router's web management interface or check the device label to verify the model is SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONTAffected if The router is not the SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT model - this vulnerability only affects this specific model
-
Verify firmware versionLog into the router's web management interface and navigate to the status or system information page to find the firmware version, or use the command line interface if availableAffected if The firmware version is not 3.1.02-231102 - only this exact version is affected according to the advisory
-
Check if HTTP management is enabledAttempt to access the router's web interface using http:// (not https://). If the interface loads over HTTP, management over unencrypted connections is enabledAffected if HTTP access to the management interface succeeds - the vulnerability requires the interface to be accessible over unencrypted HTTP
-
Inspect session cookies for Secure flagUse browser developer tools (F12) or a packet capture tool. Log into the router's web management interface over HTTP. In the developer tools, go to the Application or Cookies tab and examine all session cookies. Check if any cookie has the Secure attribute unchecked or missingAffected if Session cookies transmitted over HTTP do not have the Secure flag set - this is the vulnerability condition
You are affected if you have the SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT router running firmware 3.1.02-231102, with HTTP management enabled, and session cookies are missing the Secure flag.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable the Secure flag on all session cookies in the router's web management interface, or ensure all management traffic uses HTTPS exclusively.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41684 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data