CVE-2024-41685
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability exists in SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT Router due to missing HTTPOnly flag for the session cookies associated with the router's web management interface. An attacker with remote access could exploit this by intercepting transmission within an HTTP session on the vulnerable system. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to capture cookies and obtain sensitive information on the targeted system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a session security vulnerability in the SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT router's web management interface where session cookies are not configured with the HTTPOnly flag. Without this flag, cookies can be accessed via client-side scripts or intercepted during transmission, allowing attackers to steal session credentials and impersonate legitimate users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.02-231102CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelLog into the router's web management interface or check the device label to confirm the model is Syrotech SY-GPON-1110-WDONTAffected if The device model does not match Syrotech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT
-
Check the firmware versionNavigate to the router's admin panel (usually Status, System Info, or About page) and record the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is exactly 3.1.02-231102
-
Verify web management interface is enabledConfirm the router's HTTP/HTTPS web management interface is accessible on the local networkAffected if The web management interface is not accessible or disabled
-
Inspect session cookies for HttpOnly flagLog into the router's web management interface, open browser developer tools (F12), go to the Application/Storage tab, examine all cookies set by the router, and check if the HttpOnly attribute is presentAffected if Any session cookies (such as session IDs, admin tokens, or auth tokens) are missing the HttpOnly flag
You are affected if the device is a Syrotech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT running firmware 3.1.02-231102 with the web management interface enabled and session cookies lack the HttpOnly attribute.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSet the HTTPOnly flag on all session cookies generated by the router's web management interface, typically by modifying the cookie generation code in the firmware to include the '; HttpOnly' attribute.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-41685 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-41685 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data